Hits 11-20 within 93 documents
Societal deliberation on genetically modified maize in southern Africa: the debateness and publicness of the Zambian national consultation on genetically modified maize food aid in 2002 [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 15 (2006) 1. p.89-102
The media and public opinion on genetics and biotechnology: mirrors, windows, or walls? [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 14 (2005) 3. p.305-316
Elephants in the rooms where publics encounter “science”?: A response to Darrin Durant, “Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public” [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 17 (2008) 1. p.21-33
Bookreview: Holtorf, Cornelius, Archaeology is a Brand! The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture (Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007). ix + 184pp. ISBN 9781905739066 £14.99 (paperback) [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 17 (2008) 4. p.507-508
Exploring lay uncertainty about an environmental health risk [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 16 (2007) 3. p.323-343
Bookreview: Sheldon Krimsky, Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004), 264 pp. ISBN 0742543714, $19.95 (paperback) [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 16 (2007) 3. p.366-368
Re-examining medical modernization: framing the public in Finnish biomedical research policy [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 16 (2007) 1. p.63-78
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 16 (2007) 3. p.345-364
Book Review: The Genetic Imaginary: DNA in the Canadian Criminal Justice System [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 14 (2005) 2. p.225-226
Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference [journal article]
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 16 (2007) 2. p.163-182