SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(617.6Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-99621-4

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Brandmauer - Still alive! Empirical findings on support for the AfD by established parties in Eastern Germany (2019-2024)

Brandmauer - is still alive! Empirische Ergebnisse zur Unterstützung der AfD in den ostdeutschen Kommunen durch etablierte Parteien (2019-2024)
[working paper]

Schroeder, Wolfgang
Ziblatt, Daniel
Bochert, Florian

Corporate Editor
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH

Abstract

For years, federal politicians from all established parties have categorically ruled out any cooperation with the Alternative for Germany (AfD), erecting a so-called "firewall" ("Brandmauer") against the party. Nevertheless, reports increasingly document instances where this firewall is eroding, wit... view more

For years, federal politicians from all established parties have categorically ruled out any cooperation with the Alternative for Germany (AfD), erecting a so-called "firewall" ("Brandmauer") against the party. Nevertheless, reports increasingly document instances where this firewall is eroding, with established parties cooperating with the AfD at the municipal level. Against this backdrop, our study analyzes the meetings of municipal councils at the district level in all eastern German states from mid-2019 to mid-2024. The analysis of 2,452 meetings, during which the AfD submitted a total of 2,348 proposals, reveals that content-related cooperation occurred in 484 cases. This corresponds to approximately 20.6% of the AfD's proposals. In slightly more than half of these cases (244), at least five non-AfD representatives supported an AfD proposal or candidate. This represents roughly 10.2% of all proposals. Significant regional variations are evident, but the areas with the strongest AfD presence are not necessarily those with the highest levels of cooperation. Content-wise, the AfD secures cooperation from established parties less often on controversial national topics, such as asylum or security, and more frequently on infrastructure-related tasks within the immediate jurisdiction of the respective councils, such as transportation issues. Overall, our study demonstrates that the contentious firewall, often assumed to have completely collapsed at the municipal level, has indeed developed cracks over the past five years but remains considerably more robust than widely believed. At the end of this paper, we discuss four conceivable strategic options for the future handling of the firewall.... view less

Keywords
party; political right; radicalism; populism; local politics; faction; cooperation; voting behavior; New Federal States; Federal Republic of Germany

Classification
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture

Free Keywords
AfD; Local self-administration

Document language
English

Publication Year
2025

City
Berlin

Page/Pages
22 p.

Series
Discussion Papers / Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Forschungsschwerpunkt Wandel politischer Systeme, Abteilung Transformationen der Demokratie, SP V 2024-503en

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.