dc.contributor.author | Boatca, Manuela | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-21T11:32:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-07T00:00:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 0172-6404 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/73998 | |
dc.description.abstract | Drawing on several critical cartographers' approach to counter-mapping as method and on Boaventura de Sousa Santos' "sociology of absences," I discuss their combination - counter-mapping as a method for the sociology of absences - as a means of enhancing sociological reflexivity through a transdisciplinary lens. Such a lens reveals the very constitution of those academic disciplines that deal with the social world as shaped by the colonial and imperial context of their emergence. I argue that counter-mapping can serve as a decolonial strategy to the essentialization of nation-states and world regions in social scientific and political discourse and propose a relational perspective capable of revealing the constitutive entanglements through which a global capitalism grounded in colonial expansion interlinked all areas of the world. The focus lies on the entanglements that counter-mapping as a method uncovers between semiperipheries such as Eastern Europe and Latin America, constructed as fixed and unrelated locations on imperial maps. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | sociology of absences; counter-mapping; coloniality; unequal Europes; semiperipheries; entanglements | de |
dc.title | Counter-Mapping as Method: Locating and Relating the (Semi-)Peripheral Self | de |
dc.title.alternative | Counter-Mapping als Methode: Verortung und Relationierung des (semi-)peripheren Selbst | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Historical Social Research | |
dc.source.volume | 46 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | de |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftslogik, Ethik der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Philosophy of Science, Theory of Science, Methodology, Ethics of the Social Sciences | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GESIS | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 244-263 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10102 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 152 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Positionality Reloaded: Debating the Dimensions of Reflexivity in the Relationship Between Science and Society | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.46.2021.2.244-263 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 30300 | de |
dc.subject.classhort | 10200 | de |
internal.embargo.terms | 2022-01-07 | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |