Endnote export

 

%T Germany's Post-Reunification Effort to Achieve National Reconciliation: Muddling Through, Routinization, and Policy Failure
%A Dostal, Jörg Michael
%J International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
%N 2
%P 1-35
%V 28
%D 2019
%K economic unification
%@ 1229-6902
%~ Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-67236-2
%X This article reexamines the track record of German unification after three  decades.  The  focus  is  placed  on  economic  issues,  while  cultural,  social,  and  geopolitical  dimensions  are  dealt  with  more  briefly.  Following  the  introduction,  Section  II  briefly  examines  the  history  of  Germany’s national division and the East German political events in late 1989 and early 1990 that produced the unification of the two Germanies on  3  October  1990.  Sections  III  to  V  subsequently  discuss  the  major  political  and  economic  events  during  the  Kohl,  Schröder,  and  Merkel  Chancellorships,  respectively.  
Section  III  focuses  on  the  high  political  and social costs of the initial economic disruption in the East due to the near  single-minded  focus  on  the  rapid  privatization  of  the  former  GDR  enterprises. In Section IV, the negative feedback of the economic shock is discussed,  namely  high  unemployment,  the  fiscal  crisis  of  the  welfare  state, and the demographic collapse in the East. Section V sketches how the Great Recession of 2007-2008, the subsequent Euro currency, and the southern  EU  states’  debt  crises  collectively  crowded  out  the  topic  of  intra-German  reconciliation.  The  emerging  overall  picture  advanced  in  Section  VI  is  that  a  combination  of  muddling  through,  routinization  (here  also  termed  as  “reconciliation  by  accident”),  and  policy  failure  most  adequately  describes  the  outcome  of  Germany’s  unification  experience. 
Finally, Section VII puts forward some policy suggestions for Korean  audiences  deriving  from  the  German  case.  It  is  argued  that  the  geopolitical situation of the two Koreas is fundamentally different. Thus, South  Korea’s  main  focus  must  be  placed  on  patient  inter-Korean  engagement,  focusing  on  conflict  prevention  while  also  engaging  with  all relevant external stakeholders.
%C MISC
%G en
%9 Zeitschriftenartikel
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info