Planning in/for/with the Public
This commentary traces key issues attaching to the use of the word ‘public’ within planning practices and theories. It argues for an alternative, non-binary engagement with public practices that may profit from being cast in a Foucauldian language and epistemology.
alternative practices; dispositive; Foucauldian language; public sphere
Urban Planning, 1 (2016) 1
Published Version; peer reviewed