SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(52.17Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-49195-9

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Examining expert reviews as a pretest method

Untersuchung von Expertenberichten als einer Pretest-Methode
[conference paper]


This document is a part of the following document:
QUEST 2003: proceedings of the 4th Conference on Questionnaire Evaluation Standards, 21-23 October 2003

DeMaio, Terry
Landreth, Ashley

Corporate Editor
Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen -ZUMA-

Abstract

Die Autoren betrachten im Rahmen eines Experiments über alternative kognitive Befragungsmethoden die Ergebnisse von Expertenberichten, um die Reichweite von Resultaten abzuschätzen, die durch drei unterschiedliche Interviewergruppen erzielt worden sind. Datengrundlage bilden die Ergebnisse einer CAT... view more

Die Autoren betrachten im Rahmen eines Experiments über alternative kognitive Befragungsmethoden die Ergebnisse von Expertenberichten, um die Reichweite von Resultaten abzuschätzen, die durch drei unterschiedliche Interviewergruppen erzielt worden sind. Datengrundlage bilden die Ergebnisse einer CATI-gestützten Haushaltsbefragung in den USA zum Umweltverhalten, insbesondere zur Abfallbeseitigung und zum Recycling. Die Autoren diskutieren die Gründe für die unterschiedlichen Bewertungen der Experten und zeigen forschungspraktische Konsequenzen für Umfragen und Pretests auf. (ICI)... view less

Keywords
United States of America; survey research; research practice; data collection method; expert; report; interview; computer-assisted telephone interview; data; analysis; pretest; methodology; environmental behavior; recycling; population; North America

Classification
Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods

Method
empirical; quantitative empirical

Collection Title
QUEST 2003: proceedings of the 4th Conference on Questionnaire Evaluation Standards, 21-23 October 2003

Editor
Prüfer, Peter; Rexroth, Margrit; Fowler, Floyd Jackson Jr.

Conference
4. Conference on Questionnaire Evaluation Standards - QUEST 2003. Mannheim, 2003

Document language
English

Publication Year
2004

City
Mannheim

Page/Pages
p. 60-73

Series
ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial, 9

ISBN
3-924220-27-1

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.