Show simple item record

Messung und Abgleich von Non-Response-Fehlern basierend auf Non-Response-Befragungen: Fallbeispiel Belgien und Norwegen im European Social Survey Runde 3
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMatsuo, Hidekode
dc.contributor.authorBilliet, Jaakde
dc.contributor.authorLoosveldt, Geertde
dc.contributor.authorBerglund, Frodede
dc.contributor.authorKleven, Öyvende
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-13T13:10:32Z
dc.date.available2015-08-13T13:10:32Z
dc.date.issued2010de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44206
dc.description.abstract"In earlier rounds of the European Social Survey, non-response bias was studied by using population statistics and call record information (para data). In the third round, a new feature was introduced: two kinds of non-respondent surveys were set up using a short list of questions which were designed to study non-response bias. In Belgium, a very short questionnaire was offered to all refusals at the doorstep (doorstep questions survey, DQS). In Norway and two other countries, somewhat longer versions of the basic questionnaire were offered to all main survey non-respondents and to samples of respondents (non-response survey, NRS). Logistic regression models were applied in order to estimate response propensities. This paper shows that propensity score weighting adjustment of non-response bias, on the basis of key socio-demographic and attitudinal variables, is effective for most demographic and non-demographic variables in both Belgium and Norway. Application of the weighting procedure balances the samples of cooperative respondents and non-respondents according to the key variables studied since systematic differences between cooperative respondents and non-respondents have disappeared." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleMeasurement and adjustment of non-response bias based on non-response surveys: the case of Belgium and Norway in the European Social Survey Round 3de
dc.title.alternativeMessung und Abgleich von Non-Response-Fehlern basierend auf Non-Response-Befragungen: Fallbeispiel Belgien und Norwegen im European Social Survey Runde 3de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.classozForschungsarten der Sozialforschungde
dc.subject.classozResearch Designen
dc.subject.thesozempirische Sozialforschungde
dc.subject.thesozempirical social researchen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozBelgiende
dc.subject.thesozBelgiumen
dc.subject.thesozNorwegende
dc.subject.thesozNorwayen
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozFehlerde
dc.subject.thesozerroren
dc.subject.thesozFehlertheoriede
dc.subject.thesozstatistical theory of errorsen
dc.subject.thesozVergleichde
dc.subject.thesozcomparisonen
dc.subject.thesozLebensalterde
dc.subject.thesozageen
dc.subject.thesozBildungsniveaude
dc.subject.thesozlevel of educationen
dc.subject.thesozBeschäftigungde
dc.subject.thesozemploymenten
dc.subject.thesozArbeitslosigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozunemploymenten
dc.subject.thesozinternationaler Vergleichde
dc.subject.thesozinternational comparisonen
dc.subject.thesozsozioökonomische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocioeconomic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozDatenerfassungde
dc.subject.thesozdata acquisitionen
dc.subject.thesozMessinstrumentde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurement instrumenten
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042035
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10038106
internal.identifier.thesoz10053375
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10043384
internal.identifier.thesoz10043387
internal.identifier.thesoz10047774
internal.identifier.thesoz10034576
internal.identifier.thesoz10039352
internal.identifier.thesoz10038718
internal.identifier.thesoz10036359
internal.identifier.thesoz10047775
internal.identifier.thesoz10053635
internal.identifier.thesoz10040543
internal.identifier.thesoz10041769
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo165-178de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.classoz10104
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i3.3774de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.miscgesis-solis-00559478de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record