dc.contributor.author | Irwin, Sarah | de |
dc.contributor.author | Bornat, Joanna | de |
dc.contributor.author | Winterton, Mandy | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-23T12:34:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-02T15:51:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 0172-6404 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39296 | |
dc.description.abstract | In their article, published in FQS, as well as in HSR 38 (2013) 4, Coltart, Henwood and Shirani raise a number of issues regarding the effective and ethical conduct of qualitative secondary analysis. In doing so they seek to exemplify general points about secondary analytic practice and ethics with reference to the UK Timescapes research programme in which they were involved as primary researchers and we were involved as secondary analysts. They position our work in ways we find unrecognisable, and potentially misleading. We briefly re-describe aspects of our work, and our key arguments, with reference to the timing of secondary analysis, knowledge claims and the contextual embeddedness of qualitative data. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | qualitative research ethics; Timescapes | |
dc.title | Qualitative secondary analysis in austere times: a reply to Coltart, Henwood and Shirani | de |
dc.title.alternative | Qualitative Sekundäranalyse in unsicheren Zeiten: eine Replik auf Coltart, Henwood und Shirani | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Historical Social Research | |
dc.source.volume | 39 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.source.issue | 3 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | research | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wissenschaftsethik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | secondary analysis | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | qualitative Methode | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | science ethics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Sekundäranalyse | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Forschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | qualitative method | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-392964 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GESIS | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035502 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052182 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037018 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042804 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 347-354 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 152 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.39.2014.3.347-354 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 29900 | de |
internal.embargo.terms | 2016-01-10 | de |
internal.pdf.version | 1.3 | |
internal.pdf.valid | true | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |