SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0003392

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Über das In-die-Knie-Gehen vor der Logik der Einwerbung ökonomischen Kapitals – wider bessere wissenssoziologische Einsicht. Eine Erregung. Zu Jo Reichertz: Zur Gültigkeit von Qualitativer Sozialforschung

Bending the Knee to the Acquisition of Economical Resources—Against Deeper Epistemological Insights. Reply to: On the Problem of Validity of Qualitative Research
Acerca del arrodillarse ante la lógica de la collección de fondos – contra toda razón sociológica del conocimiento. Acerca de Jo Reichertz On the Problem of Validity of Qualitative Research [Sobre la validez de la investigación social cualitat
[journal article]

Breuer, Franz

Abstract

Jo REICHERTZ verteidigt – trotz besserer wissenssoziologischer Einsicht – konventionelle methodologische Gütekriterien für qualitative Sozialforschung. Seine Argumentation scheint mir wesentlich motiviert von dem Bestreben, den (wissenschaftsexternen) administrativen Maßstäben für aussichtsreiche An... view more

Jo REICHERTZ verteidigt – trotz besserer wissenssoziologischer Einsicht – konventionelle methodologische Gütekriterien für qualitative Sozialforschung. Seine Argumentation scheint mir wesentlich motiviert von dem Bestreben, den (wissenschaftsexternen) administrativen Maßstäben für aussichtsreiche Anträge auf "Drittmittel" zu genügen. Dabei lässt er innovative und pionierhafte Züge, die qualitativer Sozialforschung in meinen Augen zukommen können, über Bord gehen.... view less


Despite his understanding of the sociology of science, Jo Reichertz defends conventional criteria for establishing the quality of qualitative social research methods. His argumentation seems to be motivated by the attempt to satisfy administrative standards external to science in attempts to garner ... view more

Despite his understanding of the sociology of science, Jo Reichertz defends conventional criteria for establishing the quality of qualitative social research methods. His argumentation seems to be motivated by the attempt to satisfy administrative standards external to science in attempts to garner external funding. In doing so he neglects to address the innovative and pioneering characteristics that qualitative social research has.... view less

Keywords
methodology; criticism; qualitative method; empirical social research; commissioned research; validity; economy; advertising

Classification
Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods
Research Design

Method
descriptive study

Document language
German

Publication Year
2000

Page/Pages
6 p.

Journal
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (2000) 3

ISSN
1438-5627

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.