Emergency department consultations for respiratory symptoms revisited: exploratory investigation of longitudinal trends in patients' perspective on care, health care utilization, and general and mental health, from a multicenter study in Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Background: Only few studies of emergency department (ED) consulters include a longitudinal investigation. The EMACROSS study had surveyed 472 respiratory patients in eight inner-city EDs in Berlin in 2017/2018 for demographic, medical and consultation-related characteristics. This paper presents the results of a follow-up survey at a median of 95days post-discharge. We aimed to explore the post hoc assessment of ED care and identify potential longitudinal trends. Methods: The follow-up survey included items on satisfaction with care received, beneft from the ED visit, potential alternative care, health care utilization, mental and general health, and general life satisfaction. Univariable between subject and within-subject statistical comparisons were conducted. Logistic regression was performed for multivariable investigations of determinants of dropout and of retrospectively rating the ED visit as benefcial. Results: Follow-up data was available for 329 patients. Participants of lower education status, migrants, and tourists were more likely to drop out. Having a general practitioner (GP), multimorbidity, and higher general life satisfaction were determinants of response. Retrospective satisfaction ratings were high with no marked longitudinal changes and waiting times as the most frequent reason for dissatisfaction. Retrospective assessment of the visit as benefcial was positively associated with male sex, diagnoses of pneumonia and respiratory failure, and self-referral. Concerning primary care as a viable alternative, judgment at the time of the ED visit and at follow-up did not difer signifcantly. Health care utilization post-discharge increased for GPs and pulmonologists. Self-reported general health and PHQ-4 anxiety scores were signifcantly improved at follow-up, while general life satisfaction for the overall sample was unchanged. Conclusions: Most patients retrospectively assess the ED visit as satisfactory and benefcial. Possible sex diferences in perception of care and its outcomes should be further investigated. Conceivable eforts at diversion of ED utilizers to primary care should consider patients’ views regarding acceptable alternatives, which appear relatively independent of situational factors. Representativeness of results is restricted by the study focus on respiratory symptoms, the limited sample size, and the attrition rate.