Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHaugsgjerd, Atlede
dc.contributor.authorHesstvedt, Stinede
dc.contributor.authorKarlsen, Runede
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-29T13:51:03Z
dc.date.available2024-04-29T13:51:03Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1091-7675de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/93918
dc.description.abstractWe investigate the often-stated, but disputed claim in the political science and political communication literature that increasing media choice widens inequalities in political knowledge. The assumption is that in a high-choice media environment, the politically interested will consume more news while the uninterested will avoid such content, leading, in turn, to widening differences in political knowledge. Although previous studies show that high media choice increases political knowledge gaps in the United States, comparative longitudinal evidence is currently lacking. To fill this gap, we draw on data from four rounds of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Overall, we do not find general support for the high-choice knowledge gap thesis. In most countries, there is no indication that inequality in political knowledge has increased over time. Building on recent insights from political communication research, we question key assumptions of the high choice knowledge gap thesis.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherpolitical knowledge; high choice; increasing political knowledge inequality; news avoidance; Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)de
dc.titleIncreased Media Choice and Political Knowledge Gaps: A Comparative Longitudinal Study of 18 Established Democracies 1995-2015de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalPolitical Communication
dc.source.volume38de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue6de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozWirkungsforschung, Rezipientenforschungde
dc.subject.classozImpact Research, Recipient Researchen
dc.subject.thesozWissenskluftde
dc.subject.thesozknowledge gapen
dc.subject.thesozWissende
dc.subject.thesozknowledgeen
dc.subject.thesozNachrichtende
dc.subject.thesoznewsen
dc.subject.thesozUngleichheitde
dc.subject.thesozinequalityen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Kommunikationde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical communicationen
dc.subject.thesozMedienkompetenzde
dc.subject.thesozmedia skillsen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-93918-0
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10063320
internal.identifier.thesoz10035168
internal.identifier.thesoz10052870
internal.identifier.thesoz10041153
internal.identifier.thesoz10049299
internal.identifier.thesoz10049422
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo731-750de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz1080407
internal.identifier.journal2933
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1868633de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record