Volltext herunterladen
(externe Quelle)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2022.4.20799
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
Keep Research Ethics Dirty! A comment and responses
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract In his comment "Keep Research Ethics Dirty!" Martin Sökefeld questions the growing trend of routine procedures of ethics reviews in Germany. His discontent centres around two reasonings. First, he contends that the standardised ethics review is designed to protect institutions but is less effective ... mehr
In his comment "Keep Research Ethics Dirty!" Martin Sökefeld questions the growing trend of routine procedures of ethics reviews in Germany. His discontent centres around two reasonings. First, he contends that the standardised ethics review is designed to protect institutions but is less effective at protecting subjects of research. Second, the "ethical clearance" granted by institutional reviews rarely solves the real ethical issues and dilemmas during fieldwork. Martin Sökefeld ends his essay with resistance against the "purification" of institutional reviews and politics of research. Tabassum Fahim Ruby builds on Sökefelds contribution and further discusses shortcomings of ethical clearance typical for social sciences research with a focus on the standards formulated by the United States Institutional Review Board (IRB). Chien-Juh Gu adds to the discussion examples from her submissions to the Human Subjects Institution Review Board (HSIRB) at the Western Michigan University. She then contests Sökefelds's second point that uses dichotomous notions of "pure" versus "dirty" in perceiving research ethics.... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
Forschung; Wissenschaftsethik; Forschungspolitik; Gutachten; Feldforschung; Sozialwissenschaft; Anthropologie
Klassifikation
Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftslogik, Ethik der Sozialwissenschaften
Freie Schlagwörter
research ethics; institutional review boards
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2022
Seitenangabe
S. 519-532
Zeitschriftentitel
International Quarterly for Asian Studies (IQAS), 53 (2022) 4
Heftthema
Negotiating Research Ethics in Volatile Contexts, Part I
ISSN
2566-6878
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet
Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0