Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPaulson, Lilyde
dc.contributor.authorBüchs, Milenade
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T07:41:27Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T07:41:27Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn0016-3287de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/91712
dc.description.abstractGrowing evidence supports the need to re-evaluate the nature and function of our economies in favour of post-growth principles if we are to have a socially and environmentally viable future. This study contributes to the discussion on how to achieve such a future by addressing a remaining gap in the literature about the public acceptance of post-growth, since a viable transition requires public support to validate political actions. Taking a mixed-methods approach, we ask which values and socio-economic characteristics are associated with support for post-growth and why. On average among 34 European countries, 60.5 % of people are in favour of post-growth. Values such as environmentalism, collectivism and post-materialism were found to support post-growth visions of the future, but support for post-growth and these values is lower among disadvantaged people. We conclude that greater emphasis on redistribution and improving opportunities and livelihoods for disadvantaged people in a post-growth economy is key to making such a future more acceptable to them. However, this conflicts with policy preferences and values such as hierarchy, meritocracy, and individualism that tend to be more prominent among people who are well-off.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.otherpost-growth; acceptance; European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) (ZA7500 v3.0.0)de
dc.titlePublic acceptance of post-growth: Factors and implications for post-growth strategyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalFutures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies
dc.source.volume143de
dc.publisher.countryNLDde
dc.subject.classozVolkswirtschaftstheoriede
dc.subject.classozNational Economyen
dc.subject.thesozEVSde
dc.subject.thesozEVSen
dc.subject.thesozWertde
dc.subject.thesozvalueen
dc.subject.thesozsozioökonomische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocioeconomic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozGleichberechtigungde
dc.subject.thesozequality of rightsen
dc.subject.thesozWirtschaftswachstumde
dc.subject.thesozeconomic growthen
dc.subject.thesozZukunftde
dc.subject.thesozfutureen
dc.subject.thesozUmweltschutzde
dc.subject.thesozenvironmental protectionen
dc.subject.thesozKollektivismusde
dc.subject.thesozcollectivismen
dc.subject.thesozPostmaterialismusde
dc.subject.thesozpost-materialismen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-91712-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10079761
internal.identifier.thesoz10046043
internal.identifier.thesoz10053635
internal.identifier.thesoz10040229
internal.identifier.thesoz10055821
internal.identifier.thesoz10063020
internal.identifier.thesoz10050435
internal.identifier.thesoz10049200
internal.identifier.thesoz10055050
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-15de
internal.identifier.classoz1090301
internal.identifier.journal699
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103020de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record