SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-022-00038-x

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Exploring the feasibility of ex-post harmonisation of religiosity items from the European Social Survey and the European Values Study

[journal article]

Aizpurua, Eva
Fitzgerald, Rory
Furtado de Barros, Julia
Giacomin, Gregorio
Lomazzi, Vera
Luijkx, Ruud
Maineri, Angelica M.
Negoita, Daniela

Abstract

This paper examines the feasibility of ex-post harmonisation strategies using European Values Study (EVS) Wave 5 (2017-2020) and European Social Survey (ESS) Round 9 (2018-2019) data across 17 countries. The study shows an empirical assessment of the comparability of four items measuring religious b... view more

This paper examines the feasibility of ex-post harmonisation strategies using European Values Study (EVS) Wave 5 (2017-2020) and European Social Survey (ESS) Round 9 (2018-2019) data across 17 countries. The study shows an empirical assessment of the comparability of four items measuring religious behaviours (belonging to a religious denomination at present/in the past, religious services attendance, and praying), captured in both surveys. The novelty of this paper lies in the analytical comparison of religiosity indicators that are rarely assessed from a comparative perspective. The harmonisation strategy was based upon several analytical techniques that seek to determine similarities and differences between the selected items in terms of (a) their validity, by examining their correlations with a set of sociodemographic and substantive correlates, (b) their distributions, supplemented by visual comparisons and relevant statistical tests, and (c) item non-substantive shares. The findings pointed to the most consistency among the partial correlations, where individual religiosity produced the most differences between the surveys. Distributions produced the most discrepancies that also corresponded to less similarity across variable categories as gauged by Duncan's index. This paper is descriptive and exploratory in its aim. It can be taken as a jumping-off point for future research where the time series of these two surveys, and potentially others, can be examined across aggregate levels (e.g. birth cohorts, countries).... view less

Keywords
survey research; methodology; EVS; religiousness; religious affiliation; measurement; validity; data capture

Classification
Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods

Free Keywords
Cross-national data; Ex-post harmonisation; Source and target variables; European Values Study (EVS) Wave 5 (2017-2020); European Social Survey (ESS) Round 9 (2018-2019)

Document language
English

Publication Year
2022

Page/Pages
p. 1-23

Journal
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 4 (2022)

ISSN
2523-8930

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.