SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Deutsch 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Einloggen
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • Über SSOAR
  • Leitlinien
  • Veröffentlichen auf SSOAR
  • Kooperieren mit SSOAR
    • Kooperationsmodelle
    • Ablieferungswege und Formate
    • Projekte
  • Kooperationspartner
    • Informationen zu Kooperationspartnern
  • Informationen
    • Möglichkeiten für den Grünen Weg
    • Vergabe von Nutzungslizenzen
    • Informationsmaterial zum Download
  • Betriebskonzept
Browsen und suchen Dokument hinzufügen OAI-PMH-Schnittstelle
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Volltext herunterladen

(externe Quelle)

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-022-00038-x

Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

Statistiken anzeigen
Weiterempfehlen
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Exploring the feasibility of ex-post harmonisation of religiosity items from the European Social Survey and the European Values Study

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Aizpurua, Eva
Fitzgerald, Rory
Furtado de Barros, Julia
Giacomin, Gregorio
Lomazzi, Vera
Luijkx, Ruud
Maineri, Angelica M.
Negoita, Daniela

Abstract

This paper examines the feasibility of ex-post harmonisation strategies using European Values Study (EVS) Wave 5 (2017-2020) and European Social Survey (ESS) Round 9 (2018-2019) data across 17 countries. The study shows an empirical assessment of the comparability of four items measuring religious b... mehr

This paper examines the feasibility of ex-post harmonisation strategies using European Values Study (EVS) Wave 5 (2017-2020) and European Social Survey (ESS) Round 9 (2018-2019) data across 17 countries. The study shows an empirical assessment of the comparability of four items measuring religious behaviours (belonging to a religious denomination at present/in the past, religious services attendance, and praying), captured in both surveys. The novelty of this paper lies in the analytical comparison of religiosity indicators that are rarely assessed from a comparative perspective. The harmonisation strategy was based upon several analytical techniques that seek to determine similarities and differences between the selected items in terms of (a) their validity, by examining their correlations with a set of sociodemographic and substantive correlates, (b) their distributions, supplemented by visual comparisons and relevant statistical tests, and (c) item non-substantive shares. The findings pointed to the most consistency among the partial correlations, where individual religiosity produced the most differences between the surveys. Distributions produced the most discrepancies that also corresponded to less similarity across variable categories as gauged by Duncan's index. This paper is descriptive and exploratory in its aim. It can be taken as a jumping-off point for future research where the time series of these two surveys, and potentially others, can be examined across aggregate levels (e.g. birth cohorts, countries).... weniger

Thesaurusschlagwörter
Umfrageforschung; Methodik; EVS; Religiosität; Religionszugehörigkeit; Messung; Validität; Datengewinnung

Klassifikation
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften

Freie Schlagwörter
Cross-national data; Ex-post harmonisation; Source and target variables; European Values Study (EVS) Wave 5 (2017-2020); European Social Survey (ESS) Round 9 (2018-2019)

Sprache Dokument
Englisch

Publikationsjahr
2022

Seitenangabe
S. 1-23

Zeitschriftentitel
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 4 (2022)

ISSN
2523-8930

Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)

Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.