Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPrimadani, Ni Ketut Indahde
dc.contributor.authorDjumardin, Djumardinde
dc.contributor.authorMunandar, Arisde
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-29T15:28:43Z
dc.date.available2023-09-29T15:28:43Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2413-9009de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/89458
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research is to compare the analysis of the legal authority of a notary in Indonesia with the control of a notary in the United States. This research is normative legal research with a statute, conceptual, and historical approach. According to a study, in carrying out their duties and positions, notaries in Indonesia are subject to and obedient to the law, which lies in the enactment for all of Indonesia. In contrast, in the United States, each state has its notary law. The legality of electronic signatures is valid in the eyes of the law when they meet several conditions. Electronic signatures must be certified to guarantee trust for the owner, namely in the form of authentication data. Any signature requirements under the law can be met in the states and territories where ESIGN is valid. In addition, electronic signatures can be presented as evidence and will survive in court as applicable. Uniform Electronic Transactions Act applies in some Indonesian states and territories.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.otherNotary Legal Authority; Signature Legitimacy; ESIGN; electronic signaturede
dc.titleComparison of Legal Authority of Notary and Electronic Signature Validity in Indonesia and the United States of Americade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalPath of Science
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozRechtde
dc.subject.classozLawen
dc.subject.thesozIndonesiende
dc.subject.thesozIndonesiaen
dc.subject.thesozNotarde
dc.subject.thesoznotary publicen
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.subject.thesozRechtsfähigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozlegal capacityen
dc.subject.thesozBeweisde
dc.subject.thesozevidenceen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042317
internal.identifier.thesoz10053381
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10056097
internal.identifier.thesoz10039177
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz40101
internal.identifier.journal1570
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc340
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22178/pos.89-17de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://pathofscience.org/index.php/index/oai/@@oai:ojs.pathofscience.org:article/2081
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record