Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCaliskan, Orcunde
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-01T12:35:03Z
dc.date.available2023-09-01T12:35:03Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1857-9760de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/88881
dc.description.abstractOver the past decade, the political system in Georgia was marked by a two-party system which was mainly attributed to the flawed electoral system. This led to the prevalence of the political arena being dominated by the ongoing competition between the Georgian Dream and the United National Movement and affective polarization. However, in recent years under the leadership of Georgian Dream, the progress of democracy in Georgia slowed down and there was a rise in authoritarian tactics used by the government to suppress opposition. This study employed qualitative research techniques over a range of primary and secondary sources to explore the role of democratic backsliding, freedom of media, and the incarceration of prominent political figures in the political polarization of Georgia. The study contended that the "winner takes all" mindset of the competing parties began to undermine Georgian democracy and its global reputation as the rivalry threatened Georgia’s progress toward European integration. The study concluded that the rivalry and the polarization had significant implications for the future of politics in Georgia and its relationship with Europe.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherAffective Polarization; Democratic Backsliding; Georgian Dream; United National Movementde
dc.titleDemocratic backsliding in Georgia and the role of the rivalry between the Georgian Dream and the United National Movementde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Liberty and International Affairs
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozGeorgiende
dc.subject.thesozGeorgiaen
dc.subject.thesozpolitisches Systemde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical systemen
dc.subject.thesozZweiparteiensystemde
dc.subject.thesoztwo-party systemen
dc.subject.thesozWahlsystemde
dc.subject.thesozelectoral systemen
dc.subject.thesozPolarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozpolarizationen
dc.subject.thesozpolitischer Wandelde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical changeen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042361
internal.identifier.thesoz10040669
internal.identifier.thesoz10054133
internal.identifier.thesoz10052027
internal.identifier.thesoz10063279
internal.identifier.thesoz10054942
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo385-397de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal719
internal.identifier.document32
dc.rights.sherpaGrüner Verlagde
dc.rights.sherpaGreen Publisheren
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2392516cde
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.sherpa1
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record