SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Deutsch 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Einloggen
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • Über SSOAR
  • Leitlinien
  • Veröffentlichen auf SSOAR
  • Kooperieren mit SSOAR
    • Kooperationsmodelle
    • Ablieferungswege und Formate
    • Projekte
  • Kooperationspartner
    • Informationen zu Kooperationspartnern
  • Informationen
    • Möglichkeiten für den Grünen Weg
    • Vergabe von Nutzungslizenzen
    • Informationsmaterial zum Download
  • Betriebskonzept
Browsen und suchen Dokument hinzufügen OAI-PMH-Schnittstelle
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Volltext herunterladen

(85.99 KB)

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-88518-0

Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

Statistiken anzeigen
Weiterempfehlen
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Georgia's Parliamentary Elections - a Step Forward?

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Zurabashvili, Tornike

Abstract

This article reviews the results of Georgia's 2016 parliamentary elections, assesses the pre-electoral environment and discusses the major electoral players. The article concludes that despite the overall satisfactory conduct of parliamentary elections, the political implications might be worrying. ... mehr

This article reviews the results of Georgia's 2016 parliamentary elections, assesses the pre-electoral environment and discusses the major electoral players. The article concludes that despite the overall satisfactory conduct of parliamentary elections, the political implications might be worrying. Three possible ramifications stand out. First, the elections have produced a highly polarized parliamentary configuration, where the level of political confrontation will be much more intense than it was in the previous four years, thus minimizing the chances for inter-party compromises. Second, with no institutional checks and balances and with the absence of a clear parliamentary counterweight, the Georgian Dream - Democratic Georgia government might be tempted to abuse power and leave Georgia's nascent institutional democracy in a highly vulnerable state. Third, the liberal and moderately liberal third parties performed particularly badly, which prompted a massive shake-up in the oppositional spectrum.... weniger

Klassifikation
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur

Freie Schlagwörter
Georgia; Parliamentary Election; Demoracy

Sprache Dokument
Englisch

Publikationsjahr
2016

Seitenangabe
S. 6-9

Zeitschriftentitel
Caucasus Analytical Digest (2016) 89

ISSN
1867-9323

Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)

Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.