Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHidalgo, Oliver Fernandode
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T07:20:43Z
dc.date.available2023-08-08T07:20:43Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/88327
dc.description.abstractThis article theorises and conceptualises the ambivalent role of religions and conspiracy theories in modern democracies. Based on a concise comparison of both phenomena, it elaborates the similar risks and functions of religions and conspiracy theories for the political community without neglecting the fact that, under secular conditions, the spread of conspiracy narratives might outweigh those of religious messages in the long run. That observation seems particularly relevant for contemporary governance and political science, as a tendency towards social anomie in the sense of Durkheim can be deduced from democratic theory, which significantly increases democracy’s need for compensatory moral and cognitive authorities.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophiede
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophyen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.otherbelief; conspiracy; disintegration; substitute religions; uncertaintyde
dc.titleReligions and Conspiracy Theories as the Authoritarian "Other" of Democracy?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5826/2954de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozPhilosophie, Theologiede
dc.subject.classozPhilosophy, Ethics, Religionen
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozSozialpsychologiede
dc.subject.classozSocial Psychologyen
dc.subject.thesozAnomiede
dc.subject.thesozanomieen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozAutoritätde
dc.subject.thesozauthorityen
dc.subject.thesozIntegrationde
dc.subject.thesozintegrationen
dc.subject.thesozGefühlde
dc.subject.thesozemotionen
dc.subject.thesozOrientierungde
dc.subject.thesozorientationen
dc.subject.thesozGlaubede
dc.subject.thesozfaithen
dc.subject.thesozIdeologiede
dc.subject.thesozideologyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035709
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10037548
internal.identifier.thesoz10038301
internal.identifier.thesoz10096390
internal.identifier.thesoz10049150
internal.identifier.thesoz10045784
internal.identifier.thesoz10039894
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo146-156de
internal.identifier.classoz30100
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz10706
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc100
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.source.issuetopicThe Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5826de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5826
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record