Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSeipp, Theresa Josephinede
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-01T11:20:57Z
dc.date.available2023-08-01T11:20:57Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/88121
dc.description.abstractPower concentrations are increasing in today's media landscape. Reasons for this include increasing structural and technological dependences on digital platform companies, as well as shifts in opinion power and control over news production, distribution, and consumption. Digital opinion power and platformised media markets have prompted the need for a re-evaluation of the current approach. This article critically revisits and analyses media concentration rules. To this end, I employ a normative conceptual framework that examines "opinion power in the platform world" at three distinct levels (individual citizen, institutional newsroom, and media ecosystem). At each level, I identify the existing legal tools and gaps in controlling power and concentration in the digital age. Based on that, I offer a unifying theoretical framework for a "digital media concentration law," along with core concepts and guiding principles. I highlight policy goals and fields that are outside the traditional scope yet are relevant for addressing issues relating to the digital age. Additionally, the emerging European Union regulatory framework - specifically the Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, and the European Media Freedom Act - reflects an evolving approach regarding platforms and media concentration. On a final note, the analysis draws from the mapping and evaluation results of a Europe-wide study on media pluralism and diversity online, which examined (national) media concentration rules.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherEuropean regulation; digital platforms; editorial independence; media pluralism; opinion power; structural dependencyde
dc.titleMedia Concentration Law: Gaps and Promises in the Digital Agede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6393/3298de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume11de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozKommunikatorforschung, Journalismusde
dc.subject.classozCommunicator Research, Journalismen
dc.subject.thesozMedienkonzentrationde
dc.subject.thesozmedia concentrationen
dc.subject.thesozwirtschaftliche Abhängigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozeconomic dependenceen
dc.subject.thesozEUde
dc.subject.thesozEUen
dc.subject.thesozMachtde
dc.subject.thesozpoweren
dc.subject.thesozDigitalisierungde
dc.subject.thesozdigitalizationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10055177
internal.identifier.thesoz10034371
internal.identifier.thesoz10041441
internal.identifier.thesoz10046561
internal.identifier.thesoz10063943
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo392-405de
internal.identifier.classoz1080406
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.source.issuetopicA Datafied Society: Data Power, Infrastructures, and Regulationsde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6393de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6393
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record