Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorFranic, Josipde
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T10:14:55Z
dc.date.available2023-07-21T10:14:55Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2296-2565de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87842
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite the billions of doses at disposal, less than three-quarters of EU citizens received a COVID-19 vaccine by the end of 2021. The situation is particularly worrying in transition societies, which experience much stronger opposition to vaccination compared to their Western counterparts. To understand whether and to what extent this has to do with the socialist legacy, in this paper we explore wider economic, political, and cultural determinants of the COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the EU. Methods: Data from Flash Eurobarometer 494 conducted in May 2021 were used to model the attitudes of EU citizens toward COVID-19 vaccination. Based on their views and intentions, each of 26,106 survey participants was allocated into one of the following categories: (1) already vaccinated/plan to get vaccinated; (2) indecisive; (3) refuse vaccination. Multilevel multinomial logit was employed to understand what underlies the reasoning of each group. Results: The survey revealed that 13.4% of Europeans planned to delay vaccination against COVID-19, while 11.2% did not intend to get vaccinated. Although numerous demographic and socio-economic factors jointly shape their viewpoints, it is trust (in the authorities, science, peers, and online social networks above all) that strongly dominates citizens' reasoning. Given that most transition societies are witnessing the pandemic of distrust at various levels, this seemingly unrelated feature appears to be vital in explaining why newer member states record lower vaccination rates. Education was also found to play a pivotal role, which is reflected in an individual's ability to critically assess information from various sources. Conclusion: The study results clearly illustrate how long-lasting structural problems (specific for, but not confined to, transition countries) can manifest themselves in unforeseen circumstances if left unaddressed. It is hence of vital importance to learn the lesson and prevent similar issues in the future. Above all, this would require wide-ranging reforms aiming to repair the imperceptible psychological contract between citizens and the state authorities.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherCorona; Covid-19; Corona-Virus; vaccine hesitancy; anti-vaccinationism; socialist legacy; Flash Eurobarometer 494 (Attitudes on Vaccination against Covid-19) (ZA7771 v1.0.0)de
dc.titleWhat Lies Behind Substantial Differences in COVID-19 Vaccination Rates Between EU Member States?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Public Health
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryCHEde
dc.subject.classozMedizinsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozMedical Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozEurobarometerde
dc.subject.thesozEurobarometeren
dc.subject.thesozInfektionskrankheitde
dc.subject.thesozcontagious diseaseen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozEUde
dc.subject.thesozEUen
dc.subject.thesozImpfungde
dc.subject.thesozvaccinationen
dc.subject.thesozpostkommunistische Gesellschaftde
dc.subject.thesozpost-communist societyen
dc.subject.thesozMehrebenenanalysede
dc.subject.thesozmulti-level analysisen
dc.subject.thesozEU-Staatde
dc.subject.thesozEU member stateen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitsversorgungde
dc.subject.thesozhealth careen
dc.subject.thesozEinstellungde
dc.subject.thesozattitudeen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitsverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozhealth behavioren
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-87842-5
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10083052
internal.identifier.thesoz10047305
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10041441
internal.identifier.thesoz10045567
internal.identifier.thesoz10064662
internal.identifier.thesoz10049678
internal.identifier.thesoz10058883
internal.identifier.thesoz10045504
internal.identifier.thesoz10036125
internal.identifier.thesoz10045563
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-15de
internal.identifier.classoz10215
internal.identifier.journal1971
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.858265de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record