Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorRifaad, Younesde
dc.contributor.authorAernouts, Nelede
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T08:42:43Z
dc.date.available2023-07-21T08:42:43Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87829
dc.description.abstractThe challenging and reframing of dominant narratives have been recognized as crucial to the regeneration of stigmatized areas. This article builds upon a digital storytelling process in the social estate of Peterbos, Brussels, to investigate how the counterstories of inhabitants challenge the "master narrative." The counterstories foreground the spatial agency of tenants, the (dis)enabling role of space, and the difficult relationship with social housing companies. The article concludes that counterstories not only reveal dominant spatial imaginaries about high-rise estates but also have the potential to foster a more situated and experiential understanding of the relationship between people and space. However, it is important to note that digital storytelling is not a substitute for inclusive planning. Critical engagement with ongoing planning processes remains crucial.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.othercounterstories; digital storytelling; inclusive planningde
dc.titleChallenging the Master Narrative on Large-Scale Social Estates: Exploring Counterstories Through Digital Storytellingde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6493/3246de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.thesozSozialwohnungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial housingen
dc.subject.thesozWohnsiedlungde
dc.subject.thesozhousing developmenten
dc.subject.thesozPlanungsprozessde
dc.subject.thesozplanning processen
dc.subject.thesozInklusionde
dc.subject.thesozinclusionen
dc.subject.thesozBelgiende
dc.subject.thesozBelgiumen
dc.subject.thesozStigmatisierungde
dc.subject.thesozstigmatizationen
dc.subject.thesozMieterde
dc.subject.thesozrenteren
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10058547
internal.identifier.thesoz10057883
internal.identifier.thesoz10054637
internal.identifier.thesoz10066086
internal.identifier.thesoz10038106
internal.identifier.thesoz10059362
internal.identifier.thesoz10052223
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo347-358de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicPlanning Around Polarization: Learning With and From Controversy and Diversityde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6493de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6493
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record