Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHeggelund, Gørildde
dc.contributor.authorStensdal, Iselinde
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Maoshengde
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T13:27:11Z
dc.date.available2022-04-25T13:27:11Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/78714
dc.description.abstractWhat lessons emerged during the development of China's national emissions trading scheme (ETS)? It was launched in late 2017 and started operation in July 2021, beginning with online trading of emissions permits. The preceding decade was used for preparing and testing, including seven pilot markets. It was decided to start with the power sector, the largest-emitting sector, and initially cover coal- and gas-fired power plants. This article offers theory-oriented and empirical contributions to domestic-level learning, and asks what happens after a policy has "landed". We employ an analytical concept originating from diffusion theory-learning - and view internal learning as a key mechanism. We argue that having a slow and well-prepared start contributes to the potential success of the ETS; further, that the lengthy preparatory period enabled China to address various obstacles, providing a strong basis for success, singly and as part of the national mitigation policy complex. Internal learning has proven crucial to the development of the ETS in China, with the learning process continuing as the national ETS becomes operative. We also discuss the possibilities for linking China's carbon market with other markets, which should heed China's ETS experience and emphasize learning.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherChina; Emissions Trading Scheme; carbon market; internal learning; linking carbon marketsde
dc.titleChina's Carbon Market: Potential for Success?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4792de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozspezielle Ressortpolitikde
dc.subject.classozSpecial areas of Departmental Policyen
dc.subject.thesozEmissionshandelde
dc.subject.thesozemissions tradingen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozKlimaschutzde
dc.subject.thesozclimate protectionen
dc.subject.thesozKlimapolitikde
dc.subject.thesozclimate policyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10068077
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10060614
internal.identifier.thesoz10076323
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo265-274de
internal.identifier.classoz10508
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.source.issuetopicCarbon Pricing Under Pressure: Withering Markets?de
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4792de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4792
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record