Download full text
(external source)
Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102620983939
Exports for your reference manager
Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two Cities
[journal article]
Abstract Many in Hong Kong voice concerns about the fate of Cantonese, including nativists ("localists") and the general public. Guangzhou is seen as a harbinger of diminishing Cantonese in Hong Kong. News and commentaries paint a gloomy picture of Cantonese in Guangzhou. Yet rarely do we read about surveys ... view more
Many in Hong Kong voice concerns about the fate of Cantonese, including nativists ("localists") and the general public. Guangzhou is seen as a harbinger of diminishing Cantonese in Hong Kong. News and commentaries paint a gloomy picture of Cantonese in Guangzhou. Yet rarely do we read about surveys on the range of Cantonese use and identity in Guangzhou. Neither do we see analyses on how the social context differences between Hong Kong and Guangzhou may have contributed to the two cities' unique language situations. Our study delineates the Guangzhou and Hong Kong language situations, comparing mother tongues, ordinary languages, and language attitudes. Cantonese is unrivalled in Hong Kong and remains vital in Guangzhou. We put the two cities’ different use frequency and proficiency of Cantonese and Putonghua ("Mandarin") in the sociocultural context of motivation and migration. We conclude that some claims of diminishing Cantonese are unsupported. We also address how likely it is that Cantonese will diminish or even be replaced in Hong Kong.... view less
Classification
Sociology of Communication, Sociology of Language, Sociolinguistics
Free Keywords
Hong Kong; Guangzhou; nativism; Cantonese
Document language
English
Publication Year
2020
Page/Pages
p. 207-232
Journal
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 49 (2020) 2
ISSN
1868-4874
Status
Published Version; peer reviewed