Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorChen, Feide
dc.contributor.authorLudwig, Carolde
dc.contributor.authorSykes, Olivierde
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-09T11:14:51Z
dc.date.available2021-09-09T11:14:51Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1360-0583de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/74757
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comparative study of conservation planning practice between Chester, England and Qingyan, China. It examines conservation policies and plans in the two cities, and aims to contribute to current international debates surrounding heritage management. Three key dimensions of conservation planning are identified and applied to the cases: the planning tools delivering conservation; the recognition of heritage; and conservation objectives and principles pursued. The analysis reveals that enduring socio-cultural and institutional specificities contribute to moulding approaches to conservation planning. Understanding such contextual specificities and distinctiveness is essential for international exchanges of experience around conservation planning.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.otherHeritage management; conservation planning; conservation principles; conservation policiesde
dc.titleHeritage Conservation through Planning: A Comparison of Policies and Principles in England and Chinade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalPlanning Practice & Research
dc.source.volume36de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue5de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.thesozvergleichende Forschungde
dc.subject.thesozcomparative researchen
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozDenkmalde
dc.subject.thesozmonumenten
dc.subject.thesozDenkmalschutzde
dc.subject.thesozmonument protectionen
dc.subject.thesozNaturschutzde
dc.subject.thesozconservationen
dc.subject.thesozStadterhaltungde
dc.subject.thesozcity preservationen
dc.subject.thesozStadtplanungde
dc.subject.thesozurban planningen
dc.subject.thesozRaumplanungde
dc.subject.thesozspatial planningen
dc.subject.thesozPlanungde
dc.subject.thesozplanningen
dc.subject.thesozDiskursanalysede
dc.subject.thesozdiscourse analysisen
dc.subject.thesozFallstudiede
dc.subject.thesozcase studyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-74757-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10068092
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10037686
internal.identifier.thesoz10040730
internal.identifier.thesoz10050565
internal.identifier.thesoz10059054
internal.identifier.thesoz10035393
internal.identifier.thesoz10043747
internal.identifier.thesoz10034399
internal.identifier.thesoz10080410
internal.identifier.thesoz10043220
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo578-601de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal2115
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1752472de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort20700de
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record