dc.contributor.author | Hilpert, Hanns Günther | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-23T13:46:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-23T13:46:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2747-5107 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/74045 | |
dc.description.abstract | With the signing of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on 15 November 2020, the announcement of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) on 30 December, and the prospects of enlarging the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), trade policy with and within Asia is gathering speed. In the greater East Asia region, consisting of Japan, South Korea, China and the Association of Southeast Asian nations (ASEAN), economic integration via trade, investment, supply chains and digital connectivity will accelerate. In contrast, regions that remain on the outside - i.e. North America, Europe and India - surely fear that trade flows will be diverted. At the same time, geopolitics have become a determining factor of trade policy. Any agreement also represents political positioning in the context of the Sino-American rivalry, or at least a reinsurance against the risks of economic or technological decoupling. What are the economic and political perspectives of these trade and investment agreements? What goals and strategies are the relevant actors pursuing? And what are the consequences for Europe's trade policy? (author's abstract) | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Internationale Beziehungen | de |
dc.subject.ddc | International relations | en |
dc.subject.other | Internationales Handelsabkommen; Rivalität von Staaten; Implikation; Geoeconomics; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership; Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership; Status und Rolle im internationalen System | de |
dc.title | New trade agreement in Asia: liberalisation in times of geopolitical rivalry | de |
dc.title.alternative | Neue Handelsabkommen in Asien: Liberalisierung in Zeiten geopolitischer Rivalität | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
dc.source.volume | 25/2021 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | de |
dc.publisher.city | Berlin | de |
dc.source.series | SWP Comment | |
dc.subject.classoz | internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Asien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Asia | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | international economic relations | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Außenhandelspolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | export policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | economic cooperation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wirtschaftsabkommen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | economic agreement | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Freihandel | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | free trade | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Geopolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | geopolitics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Handelspolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | trade policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | ASEAN | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | ASEAN | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Japan | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Japan | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Südkorea | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | South Korea | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | China | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | China | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ostasien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Far East | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | wirtschaftliche Integration | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | economic integration | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Indien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | India | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | USA | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | United States of America | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-74045-3 | |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | SWP | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036843 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037393 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037352 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049759 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037390 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10044165 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037378 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10046269 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041441 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036832 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048140 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049780 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040272 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036845 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038303 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042315 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041244 | |
dc.type.stock | monograph | de |
dc.type.document | Stellungnahme | de |
dc.type.document | comment | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 8 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10505 | |
internal.identifier.document | 27 | |
dc.contributor.corporateeditor | Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit | |
internal.identifier.corporateeditor | 292 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 327 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.18449/2021C25 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
internal.identifier.series | 756 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 10500 | de |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |