Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Rudolfde
dc.contributor.authorKönig, Cornelius J.de
dc.contributor.authorZobel, Yannikde
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-19T06:25:46Z
dc.date.available2021-05-19T06:25:46Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/73105
dc.description.abstractWomen remain under-represented in leadership positions in many countries. Since executive search consultants (also known as headhunters) act as gatekeepers in the hiring process, headhunters' biases might influence the female under-representation. There is preliminary evidence that suggests headhunters favor men, but direct evidence is missing. Thus, this study directly tested this assumption using implicit and explicit measures (an implicit association test and a gender role attitudes survey), completed by 123 German executive search consultants. Although neither measure showed an anti-women bias (with the explicit measure being compared to a match sample from a representative survey using propensity score matching), the implicit association test showed an in-group bias (i.e., male headhunter had a stronger association of men and competence than of women and competence). The latter is worrisome because the majority of consultants in this business are men. Thus, organizations interested in more female managers need to carefully consider who they hire as their executive search consultants.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.otherALLBUS 2016; headhunting; executive search; sex discrimination; own-gender bias; implicit measurede
dc.titleExecutive Search Consultants' Biases Against Women (or Men?)de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.source.volume11de
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.subject.classozHuman Resources Managementen
dc.subject.classozFrauen- und Geschlechterforschungde
dc.subject.classozPersonalwesende
dc.subject.classozWomen's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studiesen
dc.subject.thesozArbeitskräftede
dc.subject.thesozRekrutierungde
dc.subject.thesozdiscriminationen
dc.subject.thesozgeschlechtsspezifische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozChancengleichheitde
dc.subject.thesozPersonalwesende
dc.subject.thesozFraude
dc.subject.thesozDiskriminierungde
dc.subject.thesozwomanen
dc.subject.thesozmanpoweren
dc.subject.thesozhuman resourcesen
dc.subject.thesozequal opportunityen
dc.subject.thesozFührungspositionde
dc.subject.thesozgender-specific factorsen
dc.subject.thesozrecruitmenten
dc.subject.thesozexecutive positionen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10039391
internal.identifier.thesoz10054400
internal.identifier.thesoz10035821
internal.identifier.thesoz10038633
internal.identifier.thesoz10045237
internal.identifier.thesoz10041895
internal.identifier.thesoz10038125
internal.identifier.thesoz10036282
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo1-6de
internal.identifier.classoz20200
internal.identifier.classoz1090402
internal.identifier.journal790
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.541766de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record