Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCalderwood, Lisade
dc.contributor.authorHaselden, Lucyde
dc.contributor.authorAgalioti-Sgompou, Vilmade
dc.contributor.authorCleary, Andrewde
dc.contributor.authorRose, Nickiede
dc.contributor.authorBhaumik, Clairede
dc.contributor.authorThom, Jamesde
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-10T07:43:52Z
dc.date.available2020-07-10T07:43:52Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/68348
dc.description.abstractMaximising response is important in any survey and especially so in a longitudinal survey where non-response at a particular wave contributes to attrition. A key element of response maximisation in face-to-face surveys is the adoption and implementation of thorough fieldwork procedures. The introduction of electronic sample management systems has provided more timely and accurate para-data with which to monitor interviewers’ compliance with fieldwork procedures. One of the major advantages of longitudinal surveys is that they are able to make use of prior wave data in order to identify cases at highest risk of non-response and thereby target appropriate fieldwork interventions designed to minimise non-response. This paper examines two developments in the fieldwork procedures used on the UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) designed to maximise response: case prioritisation for low-contact propensity cases and electronic contact sheets to help ensure adherence to contact protocols. We compare fieldwork procedures used in the fifth wave in 2012 (at age 11) with those used at the sixth wave in 2015 (at age 14), utilising wave-on-wave changes in procedures to compare the effectiveness of different approaches to response maximisation. In the first part of our paper, we compare our two different approaches to case prioritisation: response propensity models employed at wave 5 and a simpler approach using prior wave outcomes only used at waves 6. We conclude that the simpler approach to identifying cases which are likely to have low contact propensity, based on prior wave outcomes only, is more effective than a more complex approach based on response propensity models. The second part of our paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of using of electronic contact sheets (ECS) at wave 6 to improve compliance with fieldwork procedures, cost-effectiveness and reduce non-response. We show that at wave 6 interviewer compliance rates were higher and non-contact rates were lower than at wave 5, and argue that the introduction of the ECS has led to this improvement in fieldwork quality and reduction in nonresponse.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.othercall protocols; case prioritisation; fieldwork procedures; response propensity model; sample management; UK Millennium Cohort Study; MCSde
dc.titleDevelopments in fieldwork procedures and monitoring in longitudinal surveys: case prioritisation and electronic contact sheets on the UK Millennium Cohort Studyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozFeldforschungde
dc.subject.thesozfield researchen
dc.subject.thesozMonitoringde
dc.subject.thesozmonitoringen
dc.subject.thesozLängsschnittuntersuchungde
dc.subject.thesozlongitudinal studyen
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozStichprobede
dc.subject.thesozsampleen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10043403
internal.identifier.thesoz10096447
internal.identifier.thesoz10050423
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10037472
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-12de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicFieldwork Monitoring Strategies for Interviewer-Administered Surveysde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00002de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record