Bibtex export

 

@book{ Daniels2019,
 title = {Ways out of the WTO's December crisis: how to prevent the open global trade order from unravelling},
 author = {Daniels, Laura von and Dröge, Susanne and Bögner, Alexandra},
 year = {2019},
 series = {SWP Comment},
 pages = {8},
 volume = {46/2019},
 address = {Berlin},
 publisher = {Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit},
 issn = {1861-1761},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.18449/2019C46},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-66791-3},
 abstract = {The World Trade Organization (WTO) is facing the biggest crisis since its inception in 1995. From 11 December, the committee that deals with WTO members’ appeals, the Appellate Body, will be left with only one judge. New appointments have been blocked by the United States. This will incapacitate the Body because the minimum require­ment for any decision is three judges. What seems to be a mere procedural issue will result in major disruptions for international trade relations and might ultimately lead to the unravelling of the existing global trade order. The EU and like-minded part­ners have three options to cope with the situation and to safeguard the WTO’s role in trade dispute settlement. The EU and its partners could either endure the stale­mate while aiming for a broader WTO reform. Or the EU could strive for an alter­native appeals mechanism within the WTO, as an interim solution. The third option would be to seek dispute settlements outside of the WTO. None of the options comes without risk of failure since there is uncertainty about the US endgame, and each move could deliver proof for the US that the WTO no longer serves its interests.},
 keywords = {WTO; WTO; Handel; commerce; Weltordnung; world order; internationale Beziehungen; international relations; Außenhandel; foreign trade; Konfliktregelung; conflict management; politische Reform; political reform; GATT; GATT; internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen; international economic relations; USA; United States of America; China; China; EU; EU}}