Bibtex export
@article{ Nedevska2019, title = {The non-identity problem in climate ethics: a restatement}, author = {Nedevska, Jasmina}, journal = {Intergenerational Justice Review}, number = {2}, pages = {63-68}, volume = {5}, year = {2019}, issn = {2190-6335}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.5.2.779}, urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-66497-9}, abstract = {This article justifies and restates the non-identity problem (NIP) in relation to climate change. First and briefly, I argue that while there is often good reason to set the NIP aside in practical politics, there can be areas where a climate NIP will have practical implications. An instructive example concerns climate change litigation. Second, I argue that there are three particular circumstances of a climate NIP that may set it apart from the more established NIP in bioethics. These differences regard interaction, numbers, and agency respectively. Third, I discuss the premises and conclusion of a climate NIP, modifying an account in bioethics by David Boonin (2014).}, keywords = {Klimawandel; climate change; Verantwortung; responsibility; Ethik; ethics; Lebensbedingungen; living conditions; Zukunft; future; Generationenverhältnis; Intergenerational relations; Gerechtigkeit; justice}}