Zur Kurzanzeige

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

dc.contributor.authorPreston, Clairede
dc.contributor.authorDrydakis, Nickde
dc.contributor.authorForwood, Suzannade
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Suzannede
dc.contributor.authorMeads, Catherinede
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-30T09:27:27Z
dc.date.available2019-07-30T09:27:27Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2803de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/63331
dc.description.abstractThe rollback of the welfare state in countries such as the UK, coupled with population ageing, have contributed to a situation in which responsibility for older people’s wellbeing is placed more heavily on the individual. This is exemplified in the notion in popular and policy circles that individuals should plan for later life, particularly financially, and a corresponding concern that they are not doing so sufficiently. This scoping review aimed to identify the structural factors which inhibit people from engaging in planning for later life. For the purposes of this review, we characterised planning as the range of activities people deliberately pursue with the aim of achieving desired outcomes in later life. This entails a future, as opposed to shorter-term, goal orientation. In study selection, we focused on planning at mid-life (aged 40 to 60). Systematic and snowball searching identified 2,317 studies, of which 36 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The review found that limited financial resources were a key barrier to planning. Related factors included: living in rented accommodation, informal caring, and working part-time. A lack of support from employers, industry, regulators and landlords was also found to inhibit planning. The findings suggest that certain sections of society are effectively excluded from planning. This is particularly problematic if popular and policy discourse comes to blame individuals for failing to plan. The review also provides a critical perspective on planning, highlighting a tendency in the literature towards individualistic and productivist interpretations of the concept.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherageing; later life; mid-life; older people; planning; retirement; scoping review; structural barriersde
dc.titleWhat Are the Structural Barriers to Planning for Later Life? A Scoping Review of the Literaturede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1883de
dc.source.journalSocial Inclusion
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozGerontologyen
dc.subject.classozGerontologie, Alterssoziologiede
dc.subject.thesozAlternde
dc.subject.thesozalter Menschde
dc.subject.thesozelderlyen
dc.subject.thesozPensionierungde
dc.subject.thesozpensioningen
dc.subject.thesozagingen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10034619
internal.identifier.thesoz10035269
internal.identifier.thesoz10054262
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo17-26de
internal.identifier.classoz20300
internal.identifier.journal786
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicOld-Age Exclusionde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i3.1883de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1883
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige