Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKohler, Ulrichde
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-30T11:37:02Z
dc.date.available2019-04-30T11:37:02Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/62409
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the usability of data stemming from probability sampling with data stemming from nonprobability sampling. It develops six research scenarios that differ in their research goals and assumptions about the data generating process. It is shown that inferences from data stemming from nonprobability sampling implies demanding assumptions on the homogeneity of the units being studied. Researchers who are not willing to pose these assumptions are generally better off using data from probability sampling, regardless of the amount of nonresponse. However, even in cases when data from probability sampling is clearly advertised, data stemming from nonprobability sampling may contribute to the cumulative scientific endeavour of pinpointing a plausible interval for the parameter of interest.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherCausal Inference; Descriptive Inference; Fit-for-purpose; Interactions; Nonprobability sample; PATE; Probability samplede
dc.titlePossible Uses of Nonprobability Sampling for the Social Sciencesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozSzenariode
dc.subject.thesozMethodenvergleichde
dc.subject.thesozsampleen
dc.subject.thesozprobabilityen
dc.subject.thesozinferential statisticsen
dc.subject.thesozselection procedureen
dc.subject.thesozsocial scienceen
dc.subject.thesozcomparison of methodsen
dc.subject.thesozStichprobentheoriede
dc.subject.thesozSozialwissenschaftde
dc.subject.thesozschließende Statistikde
dc.subject.thesozsampling theoryen
dc.subject.thesozStichprobede
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozSelektionsverfahrende
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozWahrscheinlichkeitde
dc.subject.thesozscenarioen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10061922
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10052214
internal.identifier.thesoz10059177
internal.identifier.thesoz10057772
internal.identifier.thesoz10052208
internal.identifier.thesoz10037472
internal.identifier.thesoz10059882
internal.identifier.thesoz10058540
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo1-12de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicProbability and Nonprobability Sampling: Sampling of hard-to-reach survey populations
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2019-00014de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record