Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorRoggema, Robde
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-01T07:55:34Z
dc.date.available2019-03-01T07:55:34Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61593
dc.description.abstractIn this article three different responses are taken as the starting point how different types of disruption could be dealt with. These responses -repair, bounce back and grow stronger- are combined with three disruptions (sea level rise, storm surge and heavy rainfall), and then tested in three case studies. The result of the investigation is that anti-fragility (grow stronger) is a preferential approach to create delta landscapes that become stronger under influence of a disruption. Anti-fragility is for this research subdivided in three main characteristics, abundance of networks, adaptivity and counterintuitivity, which are used to analyse the three case study propositions. The type of response, type of disruption, characteristic of anti-fragility and the qualities of the case study area itself determine the design proposition and the outcome. In all cases this approach has led to a stronger and safer landscape. The concept of anti-fragility impacts on the period before a disruption, during and also after the disruptive impact. This gives it a better point of departure in dealing with uncertain or unprecedented hazards and disruptions.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcÖkologiede
dc.subject.ddcEcologyen
dc.subject.otheranti-fragility; coast; delta landscape; disruption; intervention; resiliencede
dc.titleDesign for disruption: creating anti-fragile urban delta landscapesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1469de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.classozÖkologie und Umweltde
dc.subject.classozEcology, Environmenten
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.thesozKüstenregionde
dc.subject.thesozregional developmenten
dc.subject.thesozcoastal regionen
dc.subject.thesozKüstenschutzde
dc.subject.thesozÖkologiede
dc.subject.thesozcoastal protectionen
dc.subject.thesozecologyen
dc.subject.thesozregionale Entwicklungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10050169
internal.identifier.thesoz10053606
internal.identifier.thesoz10042235
internal.identifier.thesoz10063269
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo113-122de
internal.identifier.classoz20900
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
internal.identifier.ddc577
dc.source.issuetopicThe city of flows: urban planning of environmental flowsde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i1.1469de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1469
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record