SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Deutsch 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Einloggen
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • Über SSOAR
  • Leitlinien
  • Veröffentlichen auf SSOAR
  • Kooperieren mit SSOAR
    • Kooperationsmodelle
    • Ablieferungswege und Formate
    • Projekte
  • Kooperationspartner
    • Informationen zu Kooperationspartnern
  • Informationen
    • Möglichkeiten für den Grünen Weg
    • Vergabe von Nutzungslizenzen
    • Informationsmaterial zum Download
  • Betriebskonzept
Browsen und suchen Dokument hinzufügen OAI-PMH-Schnittstelle
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Volltext herunterladen

(externe Quelle)

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.979

Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

Statistiken anzeigen
Weiterempfehlen
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

A divisão das belas artes: Kant e Hegel

The division of fine arts: Kant and Hegel
[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Carvalho, Zilmara de Jesus Viana de
Melonio, Danielton Campos

Abstract

This article discusses a philosophical perspective the relationship between fine arts Division proposed by Kant and Hegel. Aims to clarify the approaches and distances between the Division of fine arts presented by philosophers, pointing out their similarities and differences. Basing your analysis o... mehr

This article discusses a philosophical perspective the relationship between fine arts Division proposed by Kant and Hegel. Aims to clarify the approaches and distances between the Division of fine arts presented by philosophers, pointing out their similarities and differences. Basing your analysis on 'The Critic of Judgement of 1790 and Aesthetics Courses' (1820-21), respectively prepared by Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Hegel. Performs a comparative analysis between the Division of Kantian and Hegelian fine arts. Features initially the Division of fine arts on Kantian perspective, addressing the concept of beautiful art, your classification and your hierarchy, according to the philosopher of Königsberg. Then, the Division of the arts according to Hegel, introducing the concept of your beautiful, artistic forms of symbolic art, classical and romantic, exposing and analyzing also the private Arts according to the philosopher of Stuttgart. Concludes that, despite the differences between the two analyses on the Division of fine arts, such as the defense of Hegel in beautiful artistic relationship and of Kant to the beautiful natural, the Hegelian claim that there is a science of the beautiful while the Kantian conception is that there is no science of the be it, for example, featured philosophers agree, among other things, that poetry occupies the highest place in the hierarchy of the fine arts, being the more spiritual and free them.... weniger

Thesaurusschlagwörter
Kant, I.; Hegel, G.; bildende Kunst; Ästhetik

Klassifikation
Philosophie, Theologie

Freie Schlagwörter
genius; private arts

Sprache Dokument
Portugiesisch

Publikationsjahr
2018

Seitenangabe
S. 198-216

Zeitschriftentitel
Griot: Revista de Filosofia, 18 (2018) 2

ISSN
2178-1036

Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)

Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.