Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorChytilek, Romande
dc.contributor.authorŠedo, Jakubde
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-02T18:03:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:41:16Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:41:16Z
dc.date.issued2007de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/5923
dc.description.abstractThe text analyzes the character of the second wave of electoral system reform in post-communist countries. It describes the direction of the change in status quo after the first reform, which was usually implemented by participants on the basis of imperfect or incomplete information. We claim that the character of the second reforms favored the bigger and established parties and accentuated the tendencies towards establishing electoral competition between political parties at the expense of other participants (independent candidates). We furthermore use a sample of 40 electoral events in 15 post-communist countries to analyze the potential of the strongest electoral parties and other parliamentary parties to transform votes into seats, and we connect this characteristic with the electoral changes made, arguing that the logic of the electoral rules and the effects arising from the actual shares of the vote won in elections sometimes reinforced one another but at least in some electoral events - also ran in opposite directions.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStaatsformen und Regierungssystemede
dc.subject.ddcSystems of governments & statesen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherPost-communist countries
dc.subject.otheradvantage ratio
dc.subject.otherelectoral reforms
dc.subject.otherelectoral systems
dc.titleHow the Tailor of Marrakesh Suit Has Been Altered: Advantage Ratio as a Tool in Post-Communist Electoral Reforms Researchde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.journalEuropean Electoral Studiesde
dc.source.volume2de
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozStaat, staatliche Organisationsformende
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozPolitical System, Constitution, Governmenten
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-59234de
dc.date.modified2009-09-02T18:03:00Zde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
internal.status0de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrighttde
dc.source.pageinfo30-62
internal.identifier.classoz10503
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal112de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc321
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record