Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorDiedrich, Jenniferde
dc.contributor.authorNeubauer, Aljoscha C.de
dc.contributor.authorOrtner, Annade
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-01T12:59:47Z
dc.date.available2018-10-01T12:59:47Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn2197-8646de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/59229
dc.description.abstractContext: We addressed the issue of person-job-fit by focussing on both professional success and work satisfaction. Publications studying the predictive validity of (cognitive) ability, personality, or vocational interest alone have shown relationships with professional success or work satisfaction for each predictor separately. Nevertheless, these predictors have rarely been studied simultaneously. Methods: To this end we tested the incremental validity of abilities, traits, and interests in a sample from diverse occupations: In 648 apprentices and students from five different branches (Food, Tech, People, Office, Craft) the (incremental) contributions of 3 intelligence factors (verbal, numerical, spatial), 3 alternative abilities (social-emotional, creative, practical), 4 conscientiousness facets, other big five factors (O, E, A, N), and of 14 professional interests were analysed regarding prediction of GPA in professional schools and school/job satisfaction. Results: Intelligence and conscientiousness were best predictors, followed by social-emotional competence and interests, whereas other traits provided marginal contributions. Predictors varied between branches, mostly following expectations. The test battery allowed a very good prediction of apprenticeship success (max. 37%), but for some branches prediction was considerably lower. Conclusion: Criteria for person-job-fit are not swappable, neither are the predictors. Professional success was mostly predicted by a different predictor set -namely ability and the personality dimension of conscientiousness- then satisfaction, which was mostly predicted by non-interest in a certain occupation. As a practical implication, we conclude that choosing the right candidate for a certain branch one needs to use a broad set of predictor variables. Besides cognitive ability also personality and vocational interests had predictive validity for an individuals person-job-fit.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcBildung und Erziehungde
dc.subject.ddcEducationen
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.otherVET; Vocational Education and Training; Apprentice; Career Guidance; Job Satisfaction; Secondary School; Vocational School; Personality; Vocational Interestde
dc.titleThe Prediction of Professional Success in Apprenticeship: The Role of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Abilities, of Interests and Personalityde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational journal for research in vocational education and training
dc.source.volume5de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozBildungswesen quartärer Bereich, Berufsbildungde
dc.subject.classozVocational Training, Adult Educationen
dc.subject.classozBerufsforschung, Berufssoziologiede
dc.subject.classozOccupational Research, Occupational Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozBerufszufriedenheitde
dc.subject.thesozjob satisfactionen
dc.subject.thesozBerufserfolgde
dc.subject.thesozjob successen
dc.subject.thesozkognitive Fähigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozcognitive abilityen
dc.subject.thesozIntelligenzde
dc.subject.thesozintelligenceen
dc.subject.thesozPersönlichkeitde
dc.subject.thesozpersonalityen
dc.subject.thesozArbeitszufriedenheitde
dc.subject.thesozwork satisfactionen
dc.subject.thesozAusbildungserfolgde
dc.subject.thesoztraining successen
dc.subject.thesozBerufsbildungde
dc.subject.thesozvocational educationen
dc.subject.thesozweiterführende Schulede
dc.subject.thesozsecondary schoolen
dc.subject.thesozBerufsschulede
dc.subject.thesozpart-time vocational schoolen
dc.subject.thesozÖsterreichde
dc.subject.thesozAustriaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-59229-3
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionUniversity of Munich; University of Grazde
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038695
internal.identifier.thesoz10038476
internal.identifier.thesoz10040725
internal.identifier.thesoz10047651
internal.identifier.thesoz10047174
internal.identifier.thesoz10036534
internal.identifier.thesoz10037096
internal.identifier.thesoz10037053
internal.identifier.thesoz10057383
internal.identifier.thesoz10038597
internal.identifier.thesoz10040166
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo82-111de
internal.identifier.classoz10611
internal.identifier.classoz20102
internal.identifier.journal702
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc370
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.5.2.1de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort20100de
dc.subject.classhort10600de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record