Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorClevenger, Samuel Martinde
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, David Lawrencede
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-10T09:49:56Z
dc.date.available2018-08-10T09:49:56Z
dc.date.issued2017de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/58416
dc.description.abstractRecent renewed discussions of the garden city as a “developmental model for the present and foreseeable future” (Stern, Fishman, & Tilove, 2013) have prompted us to reflect upon its endurance as an agent of spatial and urban reform. Looking to extend the established garden city literature, we argue the history of Ebenezer Howard’s community model should be reexamined as a cultural history of body and environmental politics. In this commentary, we explicate how Howard’s garden city model served as a spatial vehicle for installing the biopolitical agendas of Victorian reformers keen to “civilize” working class bodies in the service of British industrial and imperial power. This entails a brief examination of the biopolitical dimensions of garden city history, keying on the prescribed restructuring of urban life and the concomitant “regeneration” of working class bodies within and through garden city designs. Our aim is to challenge scholars, planners, and policymakers of the garden city present, to consider the ways the garden city was historically planned to reproduce the cultural, spatial, and biopolitical relations of Western capitalism.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherEbenezer Howard; biopolitics; countryside; embodiment; garden city; nature; working classde
dc.title'A Peaceful Path to' Healthy Bodies: The Biopolitics of Ebenezer Howard's Garden Cityde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1251de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume2de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.classozSiedlungssoziologie, Stadtsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Settlements and Housing, Urban Sociologyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo5-9de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.classoz10213
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.source.issuetopicGarden Cities and the Suburban Antidotesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i4.1251de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1251
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record