Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorAkbarian, Mehdide
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-03T07:17:39Z
dc.date.available2018-07-03T07:17:39Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2300-2697de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.45.61.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57790
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was assessment of the human communication indexes between employees branches of Social Security Organization (SSO) of TehranMethod: The method used in this study, the survey method is most common in quantitative research. The sample size was calculated based on Morgan 271 were randomly selected based on these numbers. This study was conducted to collect data and information from the questionnaire were used. Questionnaire consisted of 32 questions of human relations which 5 first question demographic questionnaire and subjects such as sex, education, work experience, marital status and age were included in the study, as well as other questions samples to determine the basis of human relations based on the five choice Likert scale (always, often, sometimes, rarely, never ) was designed. In this project, SPSS software was used to analysis the data.Findings: The results showed that the level of communication skills of staff from the employees' point of view is evaluated desirable (p<0.05). The study results showed that the central staff organization perspective on human communication of employees in these organizations varies according to gender and gender workers on the significant relationship of the staff human relations index. 40% of male participants and 27% of female participants evaluated communication skills, desirable. So men, more than women have a positive opinion about the staff of Organization human communication index. staff's view about the organization of the employees in the organization of human relationships education are different (p<0.05) in terms of their scores significantly negatively correlated Affairs staff to staff communication skills. A negative correlation means that higher level, the weaker the staff of Human Relations have evaluated. staff perspective on human communication parameters of the staff in terms of work experience is different (p>0.05). Thus, no significant correlation between duration of working on their score is an index of human communications staff. staff's view about the employees in the organization about human relationships in terms of a significant relationship between marital statuses (p>0.05) of employees and their score to human communications index of staff. However, 35% of married people and 19% of single people evaluated communication skills of personnel, appropriate. Thus, there is no significant correlation between duration of working and their score to staff index of human communications (p>0.05). Positive correlation means that with increasing age, a higher score on the index of human communications staff are employees and age, people are more important than communication skills. Positive correlation means that with increasing age, employees have higher scores on the index of human communications and aging causes people to care more about communication skills.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.titleAssessment of the human communication indexes between employees of branches of social security organization in Tehran (Iran)de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.source.issue45de
dc.subject.classozinterpersonelle Kommunikationde
dc.subject.classozInterpersonal Communicationen
dc.subject.thesozIrande
dc.subject.thesozIranen
dc.subject.thesozKommunikationde
dc.subject.thesozcommunicationen
dc.subject.thesozKommunikationsfähigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozcommunication skillsen
dc.subject.thesozMitarbeiterde
dc.subject.thesozco-workeren
dc.subject.thesozSozialversicherungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial insuranceen
dc.subject.thesozBewertungde
dc.subject.thesozevaluationen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57790-8
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036846
internal.identifier.thesoz10035149
internal.identifier.thesoz10049318
internal.identifier.thesoz10038100
internal.identifier.thesoz10036366
internal.identifier.thesoz10036171
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo61-72de
internal.identifier.classoz10803
internal.identifier.journal1120
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.45.61de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencexml-database-57@@7
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record