Zur Kurzanzeige

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

dc.contributor.authorPaull, Johnde
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-20T12:59:38Z
dc.date.available2018-06-20T12:59:38Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn2381-7739de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57626
dc.description.abstractThis paper frames genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as invasive species. This offers a way of considering the reception, diffusion and management of GMOs in the foodscape. “An invasive non-native species is any non-native animal or plant that has the ability to spread causing damage to the environment, the economy, our health and the way we live” (NNSS, 2017). Without any social licence, pesticide companies have thrust GMOs into the foodscape. The release of GMOs has generally been unwelcome, there has been no ‘pull’ factor from consumers and there has been vocal resistance from many. The apologists for GMOs have argued the self-contradictory conceit that GMOs are ‘same but different’. Under this logically untenable stance, GMOs are to be excluded from specific regulation because they are the ‘same’ as existing organisms, while simultaneously they are ‘different’ and so open to patenting. GMOs are patented and this demonstrates that, prima facie, these are novel organisms which are non-native to the foodscape. GMO apologists have campaigned intensively, and successfully in USA, to ensure that consumers are kept in the dark and that GMOs remain unlabelled - as a consequence GMOs are ubiquitous in US consumer foods. In contrast, in Australia GMOs are required to be labelled if present in consumer products and, in consequence, Australian food manufacturers do not use them. The release of a GMO calls for biosecurity measures. After trial plots of Monsanto GM canola in Tasmania in the 1990s, the sites continue to be biosecurity monitored for GMO escape, and volunteer canola plants continue to appear two decades later. In Western Australia the escape of GMO canola into a neighbouring organic farm resulted in the loss of organic certification and the monetary loss of the organic premium for produce. GMO produce sells for a 10% discount because of market forces and the consumer aversion to GMOs. Where non-GM product is accidentally contaminated with some GM grain, the whole batch is discounted and is sold as GMO. There is a lack of evidence that GMOs can be contained and many jurisdictions have banned the introduction of GMOs. GMOs have the potential and the propensity to contaminate non-GMO crops and thereby devalue them. The evidence is that GMOs are invasive species, they are unwelcome by consumers, peaceful coexistence with non-GM varieties is a fiction, and GMOs are appropriately managed as a biosecurity issue.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcÖkologiede
dc.subject.ddcEcologyen
dc.subject.otherGM Food; Canola; Percy Schmeiser; Western Australia; Marsh v Baxter, Monsantode
dc.titleGenetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) as Invasive Speciesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Environment Protection and Sustainable Development
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryUSA
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozÖkologie und Umweltde
dc.subject.classozEcology, Environmenten
dc.subject.thesozagricultural productionen
dc.subject.thesozfooden
dc.subject.thesoznachhaltige Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozNahrungs- und Genussmittelgewerbede
dc.subject.thesozAgrarproduktionde
dc.subject.thesozconsumer protectionen
dc.subject.thesozLebensmittelde
dc.subject.thesozNahrungsmittelde
dc.subject.thesozextensive agricultureen
dc.subject.thesozhealth consequencesen
dc.subject.thesozKanadade
dc.subject.thesozVerbraucherschutzde
dc.subject.thesozAustraliaen
dc.subject.thesozAustraliende
dc.subject.thesozgesundheitliche Folgende
dc.subject.thesozsustainable developmenten
dc.subject.thesozextensive Landwirtschaftde
dc.subject.thesozCanadaen
dc.subject.thesozGentechnologiede
dc.subject.thesozfood and luxury products industryen
dc.subject.thesozgenetic engineeringen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57626-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionUniversity of Tasmaniade
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10048494
internal.identifier.thesoz10043855
internal.identifier.thesoz10039596
internal.identifier.thesoz10034842
internal.identifier.thesoz10062390
internal.identifier.thesoz10045624
internal.identifier.thesoz10049639
internal.identifier.thesoz10037448
internal.identifier.thesoz10050594
internal.identifier.thesoz10034841
internal.identifier.thesoz10034772
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo31-37de
internal.identifier.classoz20900
internal.identifier.journal1348
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc577
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort20900de
internal.pdf.version1.5
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige