Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorParvin, Annade
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-25T08:43:39Z
dc.date.available2018-04-25T08:43:39Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2300-2697de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.57.10.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/56967
dc.description.abstractThis paper tries to indicate how the candidates of Iran’s eleventh presidential election attempted to rise to power by the means of language. In this analysis, the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe is applied. The candidates tried to win the battlefield of election by creating exclusion borders and excluding their rivals. Critical discourse analysis is a methodology that can reveal ideological purposes behind the political discourses to reflect the hidden Realities. The study of the debates between presidential candidates shows that Hassan Rouhani was elected because he could exclude other discourses resulting from the rising sociopolitical crisis. Nevertheless, He could not articulate his floating signifiers and his discourse was not hegemonic.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.titleA new discourse out of a dark atmosphere: critical discourse analysis of Iran's eleventh presidential electionde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.source.issue57de
dc.subject.classozKommunikationssoziologie, Sprachsoziologie, Soziolinguistikde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozSociology of Communication, Sociology of Language, Sociolinguisticsen
dc.subject.thesozIranen
dc.subject.thesozPräsidentschaftswahlde
dc.subject.thesozIrande
dc.subject.thesozpresidential electionen
dc.subject.thesozSprachede
dc.subject.thesozSignifikanzde
dc.subject.thesozcandidacyen
dc.subject.thesozKandidaturde
dc.subject.thesozDiskursde
dc.subject.thesozdiscourseen
dc.subject.thesozlanguageen
dc.subject.thesozstatistical significanceen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036028
internal.identifier.thesoz10041158
internal.identifier.thesoz10036846
internal.identifier.thesoz10057916
internal.identifier.thesoz10048501
internal.identifier.thesoz10061850
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo10-20de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz10217
internal.identifier.journal1120
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.57.10de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencexml-database-40@@1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record