Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSinger, Eleanor
dc.contributor.authorCouper, Mick P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-12T15:16:03Z
dc.date.available2017-07-12T15:16:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2190-4936de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/52403
dc.description.abstract"The use of open-ended questions in survey research has a very long history. In this paper, building on the work of Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Howard Schuman, we review the methodological uses of open-ended questions and verbatim responses in surveys. We draw on prior research, our own and that of others, to argue for increasing the use of open-ended questions in quantitative surveys. The addition of open-ended questions - and the capture and analysis of respondents' verbatim responses to other types of questions - may yield important insights, not only into respondents' substantive answers, but also into how they understand the questions we ask and arrive at an answer. Adding a limited number of such questions to computerized surveys, whether self- or interviewer-administered, is neither expensive nor time-consuming, and in our experience respondents are quite willing and able to answer such questions." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otheropen questions; verbatim comments
dc.titleSome Methodological Uses of Responses to Open Questions and Other Verbatim Comments in Quantitative Surveysen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalMethods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda)
dc.source.volume11
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozquantitative Methodede
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozquantitative methoden
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozdata collection methoden
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozTextanalysede
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesoztext analysisen
dc.subject.thesozErhebungsmethodede
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attributionen
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESIS
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10035477
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10037921
internal.identifier.thesoz10052183
dc.type.stockarticle
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo115-134
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal614
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2017.01
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence1
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record