Bibtex export

 

@article{ Gonzalez2016,
 title = {Nonsampling errors and their implication for estimates of current cancer treatment using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey},
 author = {Gonzalez, Jeffrey M. and Mirel, Lisa B. and Verevkina, Nina},
 journal = {Survey Methods: Insights from the Field},
 pages = {9},
 year = {2016},
 issn = {2296-4754},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2016-00007},
 abstract = {Survey nonsampling errors refer to the components of total survey error (TSE) that result from failures in data collection and processing procedures. Evaluating nonsampling errors can lead to a better understanding of their sources, which in turn, can inform survey inference and assist in the design of future surveys. Data collected via supplemental questionnaires can provide a means for evaluating nonsampling errors because it may provide additional information on survey nonrespondents and/or measurements of the same concept over repeated trials on the same sampling unit. We used a supplemental questionnaire administered to cancer survivors to explore potential nonsampling errors, focusing primarily on nonresponse and measurement/specification errors. We discuss the implications of our findings in the context of the TSE paradigm and identify areas for future research.},
 keywords = {Stichprobenfehler; sampling error; Krebs; cancer; Messung; measurement; Verfahren; procedure; Schätzung; estimation; Methode; method; Fragebogen; questionnaire; Therapieerfolg; treatment effectiveness; Umfrageforschung; survey research; Stichprobe; sample; Datengewinnung; data capture; Antwortverhalten; response behavior; Indikator; indicator; Patient; patient}}