Volltext herunterladen
(354.4 KB)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-47881-1
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
How do practitioners, PhD students and postdocs in the social sciences assess topic-specific recommendations?
[Konferenzbeitrag]
Abstract "In this paper we describe a case study where researchers in the social sciences (n=19) assess topical relevance for controlled search terms, journal names and author names which have been compiled by recommender services. We call these services Search Term Recommender (STR), Journal Name Recommende... mehr
"In this paper we describe a case study where researchers in the social sciences (n=19) assess topical relevance for controlled search terms, journal names and author names which have been compiled by recommender services. We call these services Search Term Recommender (STR), Journal Name Recommender (JNR) and Author Name Recommender
(ANR) in this paper. The researchers in our study (practitioners, PhD students and postdocs) were asked to assess the top n preprocessed
recommendations from each recommender for specific research topics which have been named by them in an interview before the experiment. Our results show clearly that the presented search term, journal name and author name recommendations are highly relevant to the researchers topic and can easily be integrated for search in Digital Libraries. The average precision for top ranked recommendations is 0.749 for author names, 0.743 for search terms and 0.728 for journal names.
The relevance distribution differs largely across topics and researcher types. Practitioners seem to favor author name recommendations while postdocs have rated author name recommendations the lowest. In the experiment the small postdoc group favors journal name recommendations." (author's abstract)... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
Relevanz; Datenbank; Informationsgewinnung; information retrieval; Informationsmanagement; Informationssystem
Klassifikation
Information und Dokumentation, Bibliotheken, Archive
Informationswissenschaft
Freie Schlagwörter
Digital Library; recommendation services; bibliometric-enhanced IR; coword analysis; author centrality; journal productivity; relevance assessment
Titel Sammelwerk, Herausgeber- oder Konferenzband
Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing for Digital Libraries (BIRNDL 2016)
Herausgeber
Cabanac, Guillaume; Chandrasekaran, Muthu Kumar; Frommholz, Ingo; Jaidka, Kokil; Kan, Min-Yen; Mayr, Philipp; Wolfram, Dietmar
Konferenz
Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2016 "Big Libraries, Big Data, Big Innovation". Newark, NJ, 2016
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2016
Erscheinungsort
Aachen
Seitenangabe
S. 84-92
Schriftenreihe
CEUR workshop proceedings, 1610
ISSN
1613-0073
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet
Lizenz
Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung