Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorWard, Margaretde
dc.contributor.authorFranz, Jillde
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T09:35:16Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T09:35:16Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2803de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/45395
dc.description.abstractIn response to the ratification of the United Nations Convention of the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD), Australian housing industry leaders, supported by the Australian Government, committed to transform their practices voluntarily through the adoption of a national guideline, called Livable Housing Design. They set a target in 2010 that all new housing would be visitable by 2020. Research in this area suggests that the anticipated voluntary transformation is unrealistic and that mandatory regulation will be necessary for any lasting transformation to occur. It also suggests that the assumptions underpinning the Livable Housing Design agreement are unfounded. This paper reports on a study that problematised these assumptions. The study used eleven newly-constructed dwellings in three housing contexts in Brisbane, Australia. It sought to understand the logics-of-practice in providing, and not providing, visitable housing. By examining the specific details that make a dwelling visitable, and interpreting the accounts of builders, designers and developers, the study identified three logics-of-practice which challenged the assumptions underpinning the Livable Housing Design agreement: focus on the point of sale; an aversion to change and deference to external regulators on matters of social inclusion. These were evident in all housing contexts indicating a dominant industry culture regardless of housing context or policy intention. The paper suggests that financial incentives for both the builder and the buyer, demonstration by industry leaders and, ultimately, national regulation is a possible pathway for the Livable Housing Design agreement to reach the 2020 goal. The paper concludes that the Australian Government has three options: to ignore its obligations under the CRPD; to revisit the Livable Housing Design agreement in the hope that it works; or to regulate the housing industry through the National Construction Code to ensure the 2020 target is reached.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSocial problems and servicesen
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziale Probleme und Sozialdienstede
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.titleThe provision of visitable housing in Australia: down to the detailde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.cogitatiopress.com/ojs/index.php/socialinclusion/article/view/57de
dc.source.journalSocial Inclusion
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozSociology of Settlements and Housing, Urban Sociologyen
dc.subject.classozsoziale Problemede
dc.subject.classozSiedlungssoziologie, Stadtsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSocial Problemsen
dc.subject.thesozBehinderungde
dc.subject.thesozdisabilityen
dc.subject.thesozWohnungsbaude
dc.subject.thesozhousing constructionen
dc.subject.thesozWohnungswesende
dc.subject.thesozhousingen
dc.subject.thesozBauherrde
dc.subject.thesozbuilding owneren
dc.subject.thesozLeistungsanreizde
dc.subject.thesozincentiveen
dc.subject.thesozAustraliende
dc.subject.thesozAustraliaen
dc.subject.thesozDesignde
dc.subject.thesozdesignen
dc.subject.thesozInklusionde
dc.subject.thesozinclusionen
dc.subject.thesozLebensqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozquality of lifeen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attributionen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038005
internal.identifier.thesoz10044945
internal.identifier.thesoz10062744
internal.identifier.thesoz10037721
internal.identifier.thesoz10050933
internal.identifier.thesoz10037448
internal.identifier.thesoz10040773
internal.identifier.thesoz10066086
internal.identifier.thesoz10050696
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo31-43de
internal.identifier.classoz10213
internal.identifier.classoz20500
internal.identifier.journal786
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc360
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.source.issuetopicHousing and space: toward socio-spatial inclusionde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v3i2.57de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence1
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.miscsocinclusion-57de
dc.subject.classhort20500de
dc.subject.classhort10200de
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record