Show simple item record

Eine Evaluation von Incentive-Experimenten in einer zweiphasigen adressenbasierten postalischen Stichprobenbefragung
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHan, Daifengde
dc.contributor.authorMontaquila, Jill M.de
dc.contributor.authorBrick, J. Michaelde
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-20T10:54:28Z
dc.date.available2015-08-20T10:54:28Z
dc.date.issued2013de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44288
dc.description.abstract"Address-based sampling (ABS) with a two-phase data collection approach has emerged as a promising alternative to random digit dial (RDD) surveys for studying specific subpopulations in the United States. In 2011, the National Household Education Surveys Program Field Test used a two-phase ABS design with a postal or mail screener to identify households with eligible children and a mail topical questionnaire administered to parents of sampled children to collect measures of interest. Experiments with prepaid cash incentives and special mail delivery methods were applied in both phases. For the screener, sampled addresses were randomly designated to receive either 2 dollar or 5 dollar in the initial mailing. During the topical phase, incentives (ranging from 0 dollar to 20 dollar) and delivery methods (First Class Mail or Priority Mail) were assigned randomly but depended on how quickly the household had responded to the screener. The paper first evaluates the effects of incentives on response rates, and then examines incentive levels for attracting the hard-to-reach groups and improving sample composition. The impact of incentive on data collection cost is also examined." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleAn evaluation of incentive experiments in a two-phase address-based sample mail surveyde
dc.title.alternativeEine Evaluation von Incentive-Experimenten in einer zweiphasigen adressenbasierten postalischen Stichprobenbefragungde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozAnreizsystemde
dc.subject.thesozincentive systemen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozGeldde
dc.subject.thesozmoneyen
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035721
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10044814
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo207-218de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2013.v7i3.5402de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.miscgesis-solis-00605468de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record