Show simple item record

Doppelter Schutz bei Nichtbeantwortungsanteilen mittels nonlinearer kalibrierter Abwägungsroutine
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKott, Phillip S.de
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Dande
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-13T15:07:44Z
dc.date.available2015-08-13T15:07:44Z
dc.date.issued2012de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44229
dc.description.abstract"Given a randomly drawn sample, calibration weighting can provide double protection against the selection bias resulting from unit nonresponse. This means that if either an assumed linear prediction model or an implied unit selection model holds, the resulting estimator will be asymptotically unbiased in some sense. The functional form of the selection model when using linear alibration adjustment is dubious. The authors discuss an alternative, nonlinear calibration-weighting procedure and software that can, among other things, implicitly estimate a logistic-response model." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleProviding double protection for unit nonresponse with a nonlinear calibration-weighting routinede
dc.title.alternativeDoppelter Schutz bei Nichtbeantwortungsanteilen mittels nonlinearer kalibrierter Abwägungsroutinede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume6de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozForschungde
dc.subject.thesozresearchen
dc.subject.thesozMethodede
dc.subject.thesozmethoden
dc.subject.thesozMethodenforschungde
dc.subject.thesozmethodological researchen
dc.subject.thesozDatende
dc.subject.thesozdataen
dc.subject.thesozDatenaufbereitungde
dc.subject.thesozdata preparationen
dc.subject.thesozDatenorganisationde
dc.subject.thesozdata organizationen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozquantitative Methodede
dc.subject.thesozquantitative methoden
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037018
internal.identifier.thesoz10036452
internal.identifier.thesoz10052193
internal.identifier.thesoz10034708
internal.identifier.thesoz10040524
internal.identifier.thesoz10040555
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10052183
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo105-111de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2012.v6i2.5076de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.miscgesis-solis-00581811de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record