Download full text
(151.3Kb)
Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-435745
Exports for your reference manager
Serious Gamification: on the Redesign of a Popular Paradox
[journal article]
Abstract We challenge the idea of the paradoxical nature of the concept serious games and ask how researchers and designers need to conceive of serious games so that they at all appear paradoxical. To develop and answer this question, we draw on a theory-method that considers all forms of observation as para... view more
We challenge the idea of the paradoxical nature of the concept serious games and ask how researchers and designers need to conceive of serious games so that they at all appear paradoxical. To develop and answer this question, we draw on a theory-method that considers all forms of observation as paradoxical. We then use the tetralemma, a structure from traditional Indian logics, to resolve the paradox of serious games into this larger paradox of observation. Consequently, serious games may only be considered a paradox if we presume realities and define games as deviations therefrom. The increasing gamification of society, however, does not allow realities to be defined in contrast to games anymore. We therefore conclude that serious games do not represent particularly paradoxical forms of games, but rather next levels of reflexivity in communication design and in the self-definitions of next societies.... view less
Keywords
theory; observation; paradoxy; reflexivity; playing
Classification
General Sociology, Basic Research, General Concepts and History of Sociology, Sociological Theories
Free Keywords
serious games; communication design; paradox; oxymoron; tetralemma; form theory
Document language
English
Publication Year
2015
Page/Pages
12 p.
Journal
Games and culture : a journal of interactive media (2015)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015581478
Status
Preprint; peer reviewed
Licence
Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications