Zur Kurzanzeige

Antwortverweigerung und Noncontact-Quoten minimieren: lohnen sich unsere Anstrengungen?
[Zeitschriftenartikel]

dc.contributor.authorHeerwegh, Dirkde
dc.contributor.authorAbts, Koende
dc.contributor.authorLoosveldt, Geertde
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-05T11:39:41Z
dc.date.available2015-02-05T11:39:41Z
dc.date.issued2007de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/41674
dc.description.abstract"This study investigates the link between the effort undertaken to collect survey data and the nonresponse error on a key survey estimate. For this purpose a threefold analysis was conducted. First, the level of nonresponse error and its composition is charted. Second, it is investigated whether these levels change throughout the fieldwork period. This helps answering the question whether collecting more data implies higher data quality. This type of analysis also provides a possible framework for a dynamic process control during the fieldwork period. A third and final analysis links interviewer efforts (in terms of number of contact attempts) to nonresponse error and its composition. The results show that error due to noncontact is 2.6 times higher than error due to refusal, even though the refusal rate is almost two times higher than the noncontact rate. Also, the results suggest that collecting more data does not necessarily imply higher data quality and that a higher number of contact attempts does not markedly reduce the nonresponse error in absolute terms. The analysis uncovers the underlying process responsible for this latter finding." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleMinimizing survey refusal and noncontact rates: do our efforts pay off?de
dc.title.alternativeAntwortverweigerung und Noncontact-Quoten minimieren: lohnen sich unsere Anstrengungen?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume1de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozFeldforschungde
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozfield researchen
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
ssoar.gesis.collectionaDISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10043403
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo3-10de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.commenturn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-416747
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2007.v1i1.46
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.miscgesis-solis-00388409de
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

DateienGrößeFormatAnzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige