SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(1.027Mb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-390949

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Rahmen und Routinen der Techniknutzung: was kann man aus Experimenten über alltägliche Techniknutzung lernen?

Frames and routines of technology use: what we can learn from experiments about the use of technology in everyday life?
[working paper]

Oehme, Katharina

Corporate Editor
Technische Universität Berlin, Fak. VI Planen, Bauen, Umwelt, Institut für Soziologie Fachgebiet Techniksoziologie

Abstract

Experiments are characterized as highly reliable instruments in the development of technology, while the validity and transferability of corresponding findings to everyday usage are insufficient and rarely reflected. Starting from this shortcoming, this paper answers two questions based on the qu... view more

Experiments are characterized as highly reliable instruments in the development of technology, while the validity and transferability of corresponding findings to everyday usage are insufficient and rarely reflected. Starting from this shortcoming, this paper answers two questions based on the qualitative analysis of video data from a usability experiment. First, how does the situation of the experiment influence the test person? Drawing on Goffman's frame analysis, this paper examines how the frames of the experiment and the testing of the technology modify the behavior in a different way for each test person. On the other hand, the laboratory is not an isolated space, people bring their habits and routines with them. Based on this argument, the second question is answered: what can be learned from experiments regarding the everyday use of technology, despite the influence of the experiment framing? Applying Giddens' concepts of actor and routine, habits of the use of technology are outlined that can be expected to occur also in everyday life and are nearly not affected by the frame of the experiment and the testing of the technology.... view less

Keywords
sociology of technology; user research; attempt; utilization; man-machine system; everyday life; engineering; experiment; technology assessment

Classification
Sociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technology

Free Keywords
Techniknutzungsgewohnheiten; Usability-Test; Video-Interaktions-Analyse

Document language
German

Publication Year
2014

City
Berlin

Page/Pages
39 p.

Series
TUTS - Working Papers, 2-2013

Status
Primary Publication; reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.