Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGoebel, Christiande
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-30T11:53:59Z
dc.date.available2014-04-30T11:53:59Z
dc.date.issued2012de
dc.identifier.issn1612-9008
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/38452
dc.description.abstract"This article examines the interaction of legitimation, cooptation, and repression in China's authoritarian consolidation. It shows that the totalitarian regime under Mao Zedong was characterized by a low degree of performance and cooptation and that it had to rely on extreme repression and ideological indoctrination to stay in power. After the death of Mao Zedong, the character of the regime changed markedly. The new elites made sparing use of repression and indoctrination but did not compensate the abdication of coercive and ideological control with increases in the performance or cooptation of powerful social groups. This induced a power vacuum, in which popular discontent against increasing corruption, rising inequality, and high inflation fermented. The student demonstrations of 1989, which quickly spread to include other population groups, were an expression of this discontent. Learning from this crisis, the communist party leadership subsequently initiated reforms to increase regime performance and co-opted an increasing number of social groups. The use of repression remained a last resort option. The central findings of this contribution are that these measures significantly improved the stability of China's one - party autocracy." (author's abstract)en
dc.languagedede
dc.subject.ddcStaatsformen und Regierungssystemede
dc.subject.ddcSystems of governments & statesen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcGeschichtede
dc.subject.ddcHistoryen
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.titleLegitimation, Kooptation und Repression in der Volksrepublik Chinade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.journalTotalitarismus und Demokratie
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozStaat, staatliche Organisationsformende
dc.subject.classozallgemeine Geschichtede
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozGeneral Historyen
dc.subject.classozPolitical System, Constitution, Governmenten
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozLegitimationde
dc.subject.thesozlegitimationen
dc.subject.thesozpolitisches Systemde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical systemen
dc.subject.thesozRepressionde
dc.subject.thesozrepressionen
dc.subject.thesozHerrschaftde
dc.subject.thesozdominationen
dc.subject.thesozHerrschaftssicherungde
dc.subject.thesozguarantee of dominationen
dc.subject.thesozTerrorismusde
dc.subject.thesozterrorismen
dc.subject.thesozMarxismusde
dc.subject.thesozMarxismen
dc.subject.thesozWirtschaftswachstumde
dc.subject.thesozeconomic growthen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Ungleichheitde
dc.subject.thesozsocial inequalityen
dc.subject.thesozIndustrieproduktionde
dc.subject.thesozindustrial productionen
dc.subject.thesozEigentumsverhältnissede
dc.subject.thesozownership structureen
dc.subject.thesozIdeologiede
dc.subject.thesozideologyen
dc.subject.thesozZivilgesellschaftde
dc.subject.thesozcivil societyen
dc.subject.thesozkulturelle Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozcultural factorsen
dc.subject.thesozOstasiende
dc.subject.thesozFar Easten
dc.subject.thesozEntwicklungslandde
dc.subject.thesozdeveloping countryen
dc.subject.thesozAsiende
dc.subject.thesozAsiaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-384521
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
ssoar.contributor.institutionHannah-Arendt-Institutde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10050763
internal.identifier.thesoz10040669
internal.identifier.thesoz10056656
internal.identifier.thesoz10041251
internal.identifier.thesoz10046565
internal.identifier.thesoz10060156
internal.identifier.thesoz10034943
internal.identifier.thesoz10055821
internal.identifier.thesoz10038124
internal.identifier.thesoz10047266
internal.identifier.thesoz10038806
internal.identifier.thesoz10039894
internal.identifier.thesoz10039889
internal.identifier.thesoz10045240
internal.identifier.thesoz10036845
internal.identifier.thesoz10034610
internal.identifier.thesoz10036843
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo147-168de
internal.identifier.classoz10503
internal.identifier.classoz30301
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal415
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc321
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc900
dc.source.issuetopicIdeokratien im Vergleich : Legitimation, Kooptation, Repression / Ideocracies in comparison : legitimation, cooptation, repressionde
dc.subject.methodsdeskriptive Studiede
dc.subject.methodsdescriptive studyen
dc.subject.methodsempirischde
dc.subject.methodsempiricalen
dc.subject.methodshistorischde
dc.subject.methodshistoricalen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.methods2
internal.identifier.methods4
internal.identifier.methods9
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.description.miscgesis-solis-00580415de
internal.pdf.version1.5
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record